View Single Post
  #35 (permalink)  
Old 05-08-2008, 04:38 AM
JavaBlack's Avatar
JavaBlack JavaBlack is offline
Site Moderator
Guru
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Michigan
Age: 29
Posts: 15,068
usa us michigan
JavaBlack has a reputation beyond reputeJavaBlack has a reputation beyond reputeJavaBlack has a reputation beyond reputeJavaBlack has a reputation beyond reputeJavaBlack has a reputation beyond reputeJavaBlack has a reputation beyond reputeJavaBlack has a reputation beyond reputeJavaBlack has a reputation beyond reputeJavaBlack has a reputation beyond reputeJavaBlack has a reputation beyond reputeJavaBlack has a reputation beyond repute
Credits: 100,672
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by White Fox View Post
I don't see how this is circular logic. The two terms are not just defined as opposites, their are ideological opposites, even though a government can support some both, but only in different aspects of the economy. If the two terms were just defined as opposites, then you could an argument based on circular logic. I think a good example of this is Communism and Fascism. The only argument that they're different is that they're opposites, or that they disliked one another.
Communism and fascism are also opposites due to their reasoning. Even though the results were shockingly similar (for communism this was due to the impossibility of the ideals, for fascism- well, they succeeded in as far as putting their ideals to use).

My point is that you can place things on scales in so many different dimensions as to make no scale useful when attempting to compare ideologies holistically.
PI essentially claims that a scale I brought up is invalid... not due to anything about the dimension I used... but because it does not line up perfectly with the scales he prefers.

I'm pointing out the flaws of quantitative comparison of ideology, not any particular ieology.
__________________
"It's never over... BOY!"
The Tall Man, Phantasm III
Reply With Quote