HOLY CRAP QFT

@midcan you either misunderstand me as thinking that all regulation is bad OR you yourself don't understand how regulation can be bad.

Well the left pushed for lending to the poor and with
Democrats like Franks and Dodd in pivotal positions your assertion looks very foolish.

Great reason to vote for Obama. McCain has proven he'd lead the country and do what's right even if he had to go against his own party. McCain has also demonstrated courage, sacrifice, bravery in war, and 20+ years serving the people in politics.

You can't put in words what John brings to the table overall. Obama is unproven, has a shady past, and zero accomplishments that qualify him as President.

The bolded part makes no sense, since Obama is the one pushing for government sponsored health care. Under such a system, individuality gets taken out and replaced with a collective approach.

__________________
Kinoki Footpads. Because you are just that awesome!

I see you're up to your usual standard of acuracy ie complete and utter bs.

__________________
"I don't think we should be governing ourselves. What we need is a king, and every now and then if the king’s not doing a good job, we kill him." - George Carlin

I have read all that before Doug. It is nothing but bullet points.

How does he implement it? Who is he calling the "average" family?

All his website does is create more questions then answers.

He riddles off a page of great sounding bulletpoints. He really does.

But there is nothing there with substance. It is all rhetoric.

This is my point.

He has a 4 step plan for everything under the sun, yet never says how he plans to implent it.

Saying your going to make insurance companies take in people with pre-existing conditions is going to automatically make insurance companies raise premiums for the added cost of those individuals.

And please save me the "your against sick people" horseradish. The insurance premiums we pay, go toward the sick people already, not the healthy. Simply mandating companies to take more cost on, which is government stepping into it, is going to make it more expensive.

The man is a bulletpoint artist, I will give him that, but his Kelly Blue Policy Book, is a joke. It is bulletpoints which are just rhetorical talking points.

__________________
Kinoki Footpads. Because you are just that awesome!

They're both populists, like Hitler, Castro and the rest of them. Granted they're not extreme but Barr is just another big government opportunity hijacking the libertarian party and part of the movement. And Obama is simply a good looking, charismatic young man that has no principles and will do anything to get more power for the government and the special interests he represents.

Moreover, why do you support Obama? The pro war, pro patriot act candidate? What nonsense from a libertarian.

What nonsense.

Power corrupts, it's that simple. Now of course, government cannot help the economy or society in anyway even if they were perfectly altruistic, but as they're not we don't even need to worry about that.

However, you're just plain wrong, governments favour economic fascism. That is, colluding with big buisness to further both of their interests by means of a regulated economy, fiat currency. Moreover, neocons favour a welfare state just as much as their democrat counterparts, albeit, one under their control.

By the way I'll repeat what I've said a million times, your views are not compatible with libertarianism: that is adherence to the NAP. Do you know how regulations are enforced? You're no libertarian, you're a conservative lite.

Do you know what causes economic growth? Savings, you can call it hording all you like but it's the cause of all increases in standards of living.

Don't be silly, why do you assume that government is able to control the economy? It simply isn't, it's a violent institution that operates through coercion, so, even if government could manage the economy it would still be immoral to do so.

However, the burden of proof is on you to show that government can manage the economy so get to it.

Maybe the conservatives posing as libertarians do, the sincere libertarians however understand the symbiotic nature of the relationship between big buisness and the state.

Anarcho Libertarians is a silly term, although it's better than Anarcho Capitalist. In any case, the market anarchist understand that monopolies are the result of government intervention within the market place and realise the silliness of attempting to use government to cure what it creates.

Since when?

That's just not true, Republicans don't want less regulations. And yes, economics is that simple. Regulation can never benefit the consumer.

"Saving" money doesn't take it out of the economy.
If I was talking about saving I would've SAID saving.

Don't bring me into your recycled fights, and especially not with that kind of rude attitude.