View Single Post
  #169 (permalink)  
Old 05-08-2008, 01:08 PM
bugalugs bugalugs is offline
Commentator
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 1,284
australia au queensland
bugalugs has much to be proud ofbugalugs has much to be proud ofbugalugs has much to be proud ofbugalugs has much to be proud ofbugalugs has much to be proud ofbugalugs has much to be proud ofbugalugs has much to be proud ofbugalugs has much to be proud of
Credits: 9,492
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Anikdote View Post
MMk. So we're just supposed to hand over our national security to the UN security council. That sounds brilliant since they have such a long history of actually acting on their sanctions. Americans shouldn't have to trust the security council to determine whether there is or isn't a threat against us.
Well - the USA is a signatory to the UN Charter and this forms part of US Law under Article 6 of your Constitution.

If you don't like it - ask your government to withdraw from the UN

Quote:
Originally Posted by Anikdote View Post
So even if it determines said events to be a 'threat', they can still only make recommendations OR determine what actions will be taken.
Yes they can make recommendations OR determine what actions will be taken - that pretty much covers everything.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Anikdote View Post
But this said action taken would be by the UN not by the member state.
No - article 42 describes what actions the UNSC may determine may be taken:
Such action may include demonstrations, blockade, and other operations by air, sea, or land forces of Members of the United Nations.
eg - the Allied military action in Kuwait in 1991.
__________________
Have you ever stood toe to toe with someone that was intent on kicking your arse? C-D-P
Reply With Quote