View Single Post
  #172 (permalink)  
Old 05-08-2008, 02:21 PM
Anikdote's Avatar
Anikdote Anikdote is offline
Guru
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: here
Posts: 4,554
usa us georgia
Anikdote has a reputation beyond reputeAnikdote has a reputation beyond reputeAnikdote has a reputation beyond reputeAnikdote has a reputation beyond reputeAnikdote has a reputation beyond reputeAnikdote has a reputation beyond reputeAnikdote has a reputation beyond reputeAnikdote has a reputation beyond reputeAnikdote has a reputation beyond reputeAnikdote has a reputation beyond reputeAnikdote has a reputation beyond repute
Credits: 19,650
Default

The UN Charter also states that it has no explicit powers to control the actions of member nations. It's merely and advisory board, if part of joining meant having to succumb to the will of the council there wouldn't be any members.

Quote:
ANSWER: The Security Council shall determine, whatever, for the purposes of executing a decision so that it may influence, to the degree that it is able, some resolution where the council itself can come to agreement on a particular course of action. However, the Security Council is a committee of opposing forces and rarely comes to agreement on anything... thus where the Security Council does not agree, a resolution cannot be determined and thus the issue continues to fester... THIS is why no nation is obligated, BY LAW to comply with ANYTHING that the UN decides… ALL nations however are urged to cooperate, towards the goal of peace, or they face the risk of cooperative efforts by those member states which, given whatever the necessity may be, could well result in detrimental consequences…

The only power that the UN has is that which the member states agree to exert through their respective military capability... Not ONE MEMBER is bound by ANY LAW to comply with UN Sanctions, or UN demands for troops to execute the decisions of the Security Council.

Do you see anyone besides radical anti-American pro-terrorists leftists (pardon the redundancy) calling for sanctions against the US for invading Iraq? Are there any sovereign members of the UN advancing their respective militaries against the US for this would-be violation of which you speak?

ANSWER: NO, you do not...

Why not?

ANSWER: Because no such violation exists and they have neither the authority nor the power on which to act...
PI
I don't see any reason to repeat things that we've already covered. Your going to have to come up with another angle because the 'illegal war' thing just isn't sticking. So I either get to believe your the most brilliant legal mind in our country, or that someone smarter has already tried to take this to court and failed, just like your doing here.
__________________

Love Freedom?
Reply With Quote