So my facts are now "absolutes"? It's easy to see where the logic of "united we stand, divided we fail" leads. Failing is bad. Therefore it is bad to be divided because then we fail. We must therefore be united. But what if someone does not want to unite? Then are they to be forced to unite under the logic of "what right do you have to make us fail?" That is how you use that logic to take away the freedom of the individual.

Even small government can control corruption, they're actually better than big governments at it, due to a smaller bureaucracy and less control over economic sectors. Perhaps you are thinking of international organizations such as the WTO? In this case the government can control what is happening inside its borders, and it can work together with other government to curb international organizations. You think there are hundreds of factors like this that could make small government obsolete? Please expand. And then consider the consequences of big government. Tyranny, oppression, poverty, and corruption come to mind.

And you don't like me saying that your views are similar to Hitler's? What if I said Obama (or Rev. Wright) was a racist. Would that be unacceptable even if it was true just because they are black?

If you were Muslim, I would not base my opinions of you on that.

__________________

"You are just stuck in a box."

--Zaro