Quote:
Originally Posted by Professor Peabody
I love it Tim Lambert! Does he teach anything weather or climate related at the University of South Wales? Here's a link to his school page.
What he Teach's:
* Computer Graphics
* Advanced Graphics
* Engineering Design and Innovation
* Computational Geometry
http://www.cse.unsw.edu.au/~lambert/
The opinion of computer teacher doesn't really count for much if:
1) He has absolutely no education in climatology
2) Has never published any research supporting his opinion.
Does it. |
Yes you are right, his opinion on climate science does not account for much - that is why I would not quote him on matters of climate science. I linked to his page because he a complied a lot of information that questions the validity of the Oregon Petition. You do not need to have published researh on climate science to question a dodgy petition
But re my previous questions - still no answers huh?
You can't show us how many of these 19,000 "scientists" have actually ever published any research in a peer-reviewed scientific journal which argues that AGW is not occuring. You cannot find even 1 for me?
And you have no evidence of who these these 19,000 "scientists" who don't agree with the IPCC are - you appear to have just made that up
Quote:
Originally Posted by Professor Peabody
What then is the IPCC basing it's man made global warming claims on? A ouiji board?
|
Much of it is based on genuine research published in peer-reviewed journals.
Can you show me any published research in a peer-reviewed scientific journal which argues that AGW is not occuring?