View Single Post
  #5 (permalink)  
Old 08-24-2004, 07:29 AM
UtahTex's Avatar
UtahTex UtahTex is offline
Correspondent
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: West Jordan, Utah
Posts: 391
UtahTex is on a distinguished road
Credits: 3,489
Send a message via MSN to UtahTex
Default Social Security vs Personal Retirement Accts.

Quote:
Originally Posted by EuP";p=&quot View Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by mpotter
Now he calls the concept "personal retirement accounts." He claims this Social Security "reform" would give individuals "control" over their own future -- as in control to blow it as well as protect one's retirement.
Sounds fine to me. We're all adults; we don't need the government running a piggy bank for us.
I disagree. When it comes to long range planning for retirement, the KNOWLEDGE required to successfully invest your savings, the DISCIPLINE required to create an adequate retirement, and the FUNDS available to the individual in order to actually contribute to this plan, a significant percentage of the population is NOT "adult" enough to succeed. What a plan like this would do is to create a brand new indigent class of Seniors. And these indigents would then fall to the government to rescue.
The stock market and other investment avenues are much too volatile and complex for the average waitress, or construction worker, or truck driver to maneuver successfully. And these folks don't have the extra cash to squirrel away in the first place. Most of them are just getting by from paycheck to paycheck.
I used to believe that having the freedom to dictate how Social Security finds would be invested was a great idea. And for me and many others, it might well be. But for what I would guess is a MAJORITY of Americans, it would be a catastrophe. I have changed my opinions considerably over time.
Reply With Quote