Quote:
|
I'm not quite sure what you don't understand.
|
LOL. You act like you just proved the case to the USA Supreme Court. You haven't quoted a single law, threw out a link that makes no case whatsoever. Are you simply lazy or ignorant of the law?
The link you cite does not respond to my specific questions at all. Nothing in there states an illegal combatant who violated the entire spirit of the convention and who is not in any way affiliated with a signatory of the convention deserves protected status. Nothing describes action against a non-signatory convention violator as a war crime.
Your "case" is non-existent at this point.