Quote:
Originally Posted by klipkap
Wrong Beletesri. It says nothing - Abu just makes personal attacks. On two or three of the Zionist Myth threads Ashley ate Abu for breakfast, because she DID use facts. Poor Abu tried to extrapolate population statistics for Jerusalem as if they applied to the entire disputed Levant region. She shot him down sooooooo badly.
|
Wrong again kipklap.
Actually abu gives population Data back to 1838.. when Jews were already the Largest constituent of the population in place like Jerusalem (Safed, etc).
And states the reason for the post is not to say Jews were a majority in the Mandate or lesser palestine (what is now 'palestine' and Israel), but that Jews were in good enough number to justify "the tiny sliver of the Ottoman empire they got".
And I referred to it in that light as to these so-called/kip-kalled "annexations" to show the Jews indeed had cause for a state.
Nor could or did you rebut Most else I said-- just Leaving it out and selectively 'replying'.
Quote:
Well done Beletesri - you have confirmed the cardinal rule of Zionist Myths. No matter how thoroughly they are debunked, they pop up a short while later as if they are the pure truth. What you stated above is Zionist Myth number 2. Originally I paraphrased this Myth by collating comments from various Zionist web sites as:
QUOTE Zionist Myth 2: The formation of the State of Israel did not displace Palestinian people. The vast majority of the Palestinians in the southern Levant arrived there by immigration from surrounding areas about a century ago, following the hard-working Zionists. When Israel was formed they were only required to go back to whence they came from. UNQUOTE
I hope that you will agree that this says pretty much what you do just using different words.
Unfortunately the Myth 2 thread has been corrupted. Here is what remains of it, thankfully retaining the core discussions:
Myth no 2
Feel free to re-open the case. I still have the Excel spreadsheet with the various data sets for the various population groups. The Joan Peters debate again, anyone?
|
"Re-open" what case.
You didn't make any. LOL
Once again we have kilpklap referring/declaring SO-CALLED 'Myths', when he has no proof they are myths..
Referring us only to his own previous EMPTY one-sentence strings declaring they are myths.
That's not even circular reasoning- that's Double-nothing reasoning.