View Single Post
  #25 (permalink)  
Old 08-25-2004, 03:22 AM
LordNurgle LordNurgle is offline
Observer
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 64
LordNurgle is on a distinguished road
Credits: 451
Default Political "chemistry"

Quote:
Originally Posted by johnnyC";p=&quot View Post
lordnurgle- i would have to disagree with you on that one. national does not mean right wing. the main difference i have seen between left and right is that the left wants more centralized government control while the right wants less of it. we could call it either national and international socialism, or we could call it micro and macro socialism. both are socialism, only on different levels. just because the nazis may have been more to the right than the communists doesn't mean that they were right wing. they were 99% lefties while the communists were 100%. still sounds left to me.

has anyone read those speeches i posted? they opened my eyes to how the national socialists really felt about things. and here for all these years i was taught that nazis were capitalists!
-j
It is a tricky matter, probably we are saying the same thing with different words.

THe triky part is that "right wing" has been used to define HItler, Pinochet and Reagan, while "left wing" can describe Stalin, Kennedy and Zapatero. Just to make some examples.

THe real point is that the Right-Left definition is "FUBAR" if you let me use this expression. People usually decide one side is "good" and then they put in that side what they believe is good.

Probably it would be best to choose an analytical approach, and try to decompose political doctrines in their components.
Reply With Quote