View Single Post
  #9 (permalink)  
Old 08-25-2004, 07:22 AM
mpotter mpotter is offline
Commentator
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Posts: 1,145
mpotter is on a distinguished road
Credits: 9,983
Default (*)(*)(*)(*)...

Quote:
Originally Posted by stekim";p=&quot View Post
Russia and Chechnya have been warring on and off since 1991. The war is unpopular in the west. So, while fighting does continue, Russia is under pressure to not go full out. Two quotes.

Condoleezza Rice: "For instance, on Chechnya, we clearly have differences with the Russian government about Chechnya. We've said to them that we fully agree that the Chechen leadership should not involve itself with terrorist elements in that region, and there are terrorist elements in that region. But that not every Chechen is a terrorist and that the Chechens' legitimate aspirations for political solution should be pursued by the Russians. And we have been very actively pressing the Russian government to move on the political front with Chechnya".

The Senate Foreign Relations Committee: "Western criticism of the Chechen war has heightened Russian suspicions about US and Western activity in neighboring areas, be it energy pipeline decisions involving the Caucasus and Central Asia, NATO's continuing role in the Balkans, or NATO's relations with the Baltic states".

Russia is very sensitive to how the West responds to such issues. My guess is that IF Chechen rebels hijacked the planes, it would give Putin the go ahead to wipe them out. And he would. And like Catz stated, the Russians have historically not had much of a hang up regarding human rights.
I guess we just sit back and wait then...this is a horrible turn of events, and it sounds like it could get a lot worse from what you and Catz are saying. How can they prove who caused the crashes?
Reply With Quote