View Single Post
  #8 (permalink)  
Old 08-27-2004, 07:14 PM
SedyAlpha's Avatar
SedyAlpha SedyAlpha is offline
Commentator
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: second front ; Mexico
Posts: 1,091
SedyAlpha is on a distinguished road
Credits: 17,142
Send a message via ICQ to SedyAlpha
Default binny boy is yemany. Born there.

Quote:
Originally Posted by 3arby";p=&quot View Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by gkjjehunter";p=&quot View Post
When corporate capitalism forces itself culturally on Islamic culture, it's response is to survive. Survival has expanded to include murder of 'infadels'. Apparently they fear emminent danger that their culture is being targeted for transition to capitalism. The world is being forced into a global consumer economy. The Islamic culture sees this and will not die willingly.
U know, I always like your posts, as I repsect your objective way of thinking. Now I need to explain a point that u may didnīt get very well for a cultural difference :

Capitalism is the Islamic economical system too. What is not Islamic in the American version of capitalism, is the evil side. In other words, throwing wheat productions in the ocean or sponsoring farmers and asking them not produce sothat the prices keep on their high rates, while claiming being deeply touched by pictures of people dying of hunger in Africa. This is what a Muslim wouldnīt do.
Now, the resistance of Islam to the western cultural invasion (which is not a resistance to capitalism, as I said) has other sides. There are a lot of features in western societies which are uncompatible with Islam, and we could spend a whole year mentioning them, so we will just stop at mentioning their existence. Resisting to cultural differences is not something very specific to Muslims. U know, in Bavaria u can see more Bavarian flags than German ones. Does it mean refusing German identity? No, it is simply the pride and the attachement to the own culture. Itīs the right of every culture, and nobody can deny this right for Muslims, too.
Now letīs come to this story of "Infadels" : actually I donīt whom do u mean by this word. But I assume that u want the civilians kidnapped in Iraq, or probably all the western victims of the so called "terrorism". An advice : try to take more seriously the arguments of the "terrorists". They may look totally disoriented for u, but if the US took them more seriously, we could have saved a lot of lives today. When in 1997 Ben LAden was interviewed by CNN, he said that his goal is not to change NY to an ash tray or to an Islamic capital. He complained of the American military presence in his own land, thing that was considered as a red line by the American administrations, though, it is a very simple, normal and natural request. Freedom is a universal right for evey body, and UBL (and Arabs) are not the only ones asking for the withdrawal of AMerican troops. Japaneses have already asked for the same thing since long time. AMerican administration, being embarrassed by the legitimacy of Arabic demands, tried to show this anti-amrican movement (represented from the military-active point of view by Al Qaeda, although it had a lot of features, like the Arabic lawyers union, the Arabic writers union.. etc) as a refusal of the western values. However, refusing by itself is natural right, and every body has the right to choose what is suitable for him. So we began to hear more stupid explanations, like the jalousy of American success or American way of life.. Strangely, for a lot of Americans, this jealousy-envy was enough to explain why a hijacker would kill himself!! A valid cause, as if these people, coming from a strange and unknown culture, have nothing to do, and are very likely to kill someomne for his NKE shoes or his LEE jeans. I donīt know how much American leaders respect their own people to make them beleive such stupid arguments, but this shows at least how far the American main opinion can be manipulated, from the political leadership point of view. Sorry AMericans, but I wouldnīt feel respected when my president shows up on the TV and tells me that the American freedom was attacked.
Having said that, u should better try to look for the reasons of the acts u see as terrorism. For instance, struggle in Iraq against your soldiers is a normal resistance that u may face in every country u invade. I donīt recall Vietnamese flowers given to American soldiers. U should learn from your mistakes.
And those persons that u saw being beheaded were so treated (although I donīt agree on this treatement, it is against the Islamic rules, just like the Article shows) because they cooperate with the occupation army.
And the fact of having Arabs but non Iraqis fighting in Iraq doesnīt mean that these people are the terrorists u r looking for. I know some firends, normal students, who choosed to travel to Iraq before American invasion, simply because we beleive that our land and our people are under unfair invasion. (this is a feature of Arabic and Muslim personnality that u may not understand, but Iraq is a part of our Arabic land, and Iraqis are not foreigners, they r compatriots, although we donīt share the same "official" country).
I wish now u understand better the Arabic point of view.
No, I am not just talking about iraq.

More sectarian Muslim murders. Bombings almost every day. A reminder that this war is not just about the West versus radical
Islam, but radical Islam versus the peaceful members of that religion.
http://www.guardian.co.uk/pakistan/S...211848,00.html

http://memri.org/bin/articles.cgi?Pa...=sd&ID=SP72104
International Islamic Conference: Genuine Call for Tolerance or Reiteration of Hollow Slogans?

In late April 2004, representatives of 65 countries convened in Cairo, Egypt for the 16th International Islamic Conference,
which was dedicated to "Tolerance in the Islamic Culture." Non-Muslim European observers were also invited, among them
Belgian intellectual Hans Miessen, [1] who found much to criticize in the conference proceedings and resolutions.

When, citing time constraints, the organizers denied Miessen an opportunity to comment, he accused the Muslims of a "lack of
transparency and failure to maintain a serious and honest dialogue with others, which has resulted in a clash between them
and the West and brought about the U.S. occupation of Iraq and Afghanistan." He stated that "the conference discussions were
pointless, the research it presented was purposeless, and the participants spoke demagogically and no more." He called on
Muslims to present practical examples of tolerance in various areas, and not to settle for words, hollow slogans, and glorif
ication of bygone eras of Islam. [2]


I submit its the other side that needs to listen. Since when dose ben laden run the sovereign nation of saudi arabia????????

http://memri.org/bin/articles.cgi?Pa...=sd&ID=SP68104
Saudi Columnist: 'The Creed that Sanctions Blowing Up Worshippers in Mosques ... Should Be Declared the Public Enemy of
Humanity'

Numerous articles in the Arab press have criticized the U.S. and world Zionism for every misfortune that befalls the Middle
East. The following article, written in the Saudi English-language Arab News by columnist Muhammad Al-Rasheed, criticized
Arabs for blaming the U.S. for the terror attacks in Karbala and Baghdad. The following is the article : [1]

Terrorists in Iraq Are More Barbarous Than Saddam
"Just when we seem to have moved a step forward, something happens to make us take ten steps back. Sacrificial blood in
Karbala and Baghdad is nothing new but the latest atrocity on the most sacred day for the Shia was a criminal act of
monstrous proportions. The carnage and the spectacle were on a scale not seen since the last sacking of Karbala over a
century ago.

"The perpetrators have an agenda more vicious than anything Saddam could have dreamed up. Saddam killed and maimed to
maintain his rule by brute force. These people kill and maim to turn people against each other and to satisfy a bloodlust
based on elitism in theological terms. In other words, they want to win in this world and go to heaven in the next. I don't
think Saddam was that optimistic; otherwise, the Americans would not have found him alive in a hole."

'Arabs Blame Others and Shun the Facts'


http://memri.org/bin/articles.cgi?Pa...=sd&ID=SP59103
New Al-Qa'ida Online Magazine Features Interview with a 'Most-Wanted' Saudi Islamist, Calls for Killing of Americans and Non-Muslims

http://www.jihadwatch.org/archives/000088.php

http://www.benadorassociates.com/article/711

And when the french tanker was hit, the perp said ,when he found out they were not Americans< well they were still infidels anyway.

Please. The saudis have not asked us to leave and if they wanted it so strongly there would be another iran there already.

Japan has not asked us to pull out.Move trops yes, but not leave all to gether.

Vietnam is irrelavant to todays isue and none of this had anything to do with terrorist. Vietnam is not a breeding ground at all and niether is japan.

They want a calief. Name me 1 free democratic dtate that is muslim in the way you described above. Turkey is in natos corner remember and the troops there were welcomed aginst russia and are still there.
Reply With Quote