Quote:
Originally Posted by bugalugs
No - I have read this thread. There is a very small handful of links to papers which suggest that the impacts of AGW may be limited for various reasons (Lindzen etc). Or papers by non-climate scientists like McIntyre which have since been completely refuted in peer-reviewed responses. Most of these papers quoted have appeared in the journal Energy and Environment which is not a recognised journal.
So, stop being ridiculous? If there is such a strong argument that AGW is not occurring - why is the scientific literature so scarce? Where is the real scientific debate?
|
McIntyre might not be a climate scientist, but he is statistician, so why do you have such a problem with him proving that the Hockey Stick manipulated datasources to get its shape?
Arguing with you is pointless because you refuse to discuss the science or accept any source I provide. So why bother with you? I've shown you where the debate is, where your argument down-right sucks, if you aren't going to listen or have a discussion with me, there's no reason for you to complain.