View Single Post
  #27 (permalink)  
Old 06-07-2008, 11:15 AM
Htown-Boliviano Htown-Boliviano is offline
Commentator
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Houston, TX
Posts: 1,024
usa us texas
Htown-Boliviano will become famous soon enoughHtown-Boliviano will become famous soon enough
Credits: 6,504
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by JeromeJohnson View Post
No, there was no Recession in 1992. There was however a very mild recession in late 1990 with the last qrtr of 90 and the first of 91 realizing negative growth.

1992 realized an excellent economy, which was being reported by the same mainstream media which talked down the outstanding economic performance of Bush fiscal and tax policy. But that was only fair considering they talked up the ruinous tax and fiscal policy of the Clinton regime.

"Its the Economy Stupid" which the Clinton campaign and its sycophants in the MSM media heralded in an hourly basis, falsely claiming that 1992 was "the worst economy in 50 Years!" In fact, 1992 realized nearly 6% growth in GDP which out performed four of the 8 years of the Clintonomy.

Ironically, the last year of the Clintonomy was outperformed by "The Worst Economy in 50 years by a full 2 percentage points and th last year in which its economic policy remained fully in effect "The Worst Economy in 50 Years" outperformed Clintonomy Policy by nearly 5 percentage points.

Now this is according ot the Bureau of Economic Analysis, but all they do is crunch economic data so they're objectivity is automatically suspect.
I'm guessing the falling dollar, the housing market, and the rise on of unemployment is due to Bush's great economic policies.


How is there objectivity question? They don't have any officially or unofficially allegiance to any political party. In fact most economist are about lowering taxes and proponents of free market.
__________________
In the land of the blind, the man with one eye is the king
- Nas
Reply With Quote