View Single Post
  #8 (permalink)  
Old 06-08-2008, 04:39 PM
masterproctor's Avatar
masterproctor masterproctor is offline
Sr. Correspondent
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: AmerikA
Posts: 401
us california
masterproctor has a spectacular aura aboutmasterproctor has a spectacular aura about
Credits: 4,318
Send a message via AIM to masterproctor
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Htown-Boliviano View Post
Just because there is oil doesn't mean companies will start drilling. Companies take factors in to account such as the cost of transporting equipment and workers to the area, the terrain might be make drilling to costly, the demand must justify the high cost, and the cost benefit analysis of drilling in rough terrain. It's risky and quite drilling into hard terrain because you aren't certain that enough oil will be discovered to justify expenses. Computer can only do so much and many time there calculations are off. Right now I think the oil companies are probably waiting for demand to justify the expenses in drilling into rough terrain.
At $140 (last time I checked so don't pounce on me if it changed) a barrel I think anything justfies drilling for that oil.

But I understand what you are saying. However, Canada's shael oil wasn't mined until recently because the cost-benefit wasn't favorable enough until oil started reaching about $50 a barrel. I hardly think land drilling can be that costly compared to deep-sea oil drilling, which has a much higher cost-benefit analysis.
__________________
Signature:
Reply With Quote