Why did you choose 1998? Why not the previous year OR the next year to base your reference temperature on.

WE ALL KNOW DONT WE FOLKS - MORE LIES AND SPIN FROM THE FOSSIL FUEL LOBBY GROUPS.

What is the red trend line temperature doing in the graph below - going down is it? NO!

Notice the fluctutations in temperature for each year? 1998 was a spike year - AND that why the propagandists use that year as a SOLE temperature reference point and compare it with subsequent years and CLAIM a cooling period WHEN IN FACT the general trend has been GLOBAL WARMING for many decades now.

They dont try the same analysis with say 1997 or 1999 - WE NOW KNOW WHY HEY!

I believe its called PSUEDO-SCIENCE - you know, fudge or slant the statistical data in such a way as to give the conclusions that you want to give.

And the purpose is to delude and confuse the general public.

Notice how scientists or mathematicians or even anyone with an ounce of sense that is prepared to carefully examine these fraudualnt claims of global cooling ARE NOT SUCKERED IN BY THEM.?

YOU CANT JUST PICK AND CHOOSE THE INDIVIDUAL TEMPERATURE VALUES YOU WANT IN A DATA SPREAD AND MAKE GENERAL CONCLUSIONS OF WHAT IS HAPPENING TO THE TREND IN GLOBAL SURFACE TEMPERATURE. MATHEMATICIANS HAVE A TECHINCAL WORD FOR THIS TECHNIQUE - ITS CALLED BULLDUST