Quote:
Originally Posted by JavaBlack
This is the most hilarious thing I've read all day.
You are pointing out the flaws of Wikipedia (as all sides do when it helps a different side) to completely strike down a point... despite Wikipedia providing links to most of its points and having some self-corrective abilities on issues (usually dependent on the hotness of the topic... less "important" topics don't get a lot of attention... but on a current political candidate- come on)...
So OK Wikipedia has its problems...
But while you point this out- you're uncritically accepting pure political propaganda!
Political propaganda is okay so long as it comes from 100% biased and spun sources rather than a wiki model that might have some amount of balance?!
Of course later we'll see this countered with "conservapedia", the wiki with an ideological litmus test because conservatives don't like to bother having their ideas scrutinized by liberals and countered by liberals...
Oy vey.
Come on, guys... If you're going to accept some crap and not others, at least don't pretend it makes you objective?
|
yea. thats why i said its hands down so far the dumbest post of today. wiki is the most unbiased source of info you can get. if he doesnt want to sit down and read it which lists his accomplishments instead of waiting for somebody to copy and paste it, too bad for him.