View Single Post
  #191 (permalink)  
Old 06-16-2008, 06:23 PM
C-D-P C-D-P is offline
Analyst
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 2,852
usa
C-D-P has much to be proud ofC-D-P has much to be proud ofC-D-P has much to be proud ofC-D-P has much to be proud ofC-D-P has much to be proud ofC-D-P has much to be proud ofC-D-P has much to be proud ofC-D-P has much to be proud ofC-D-P has much to be proud of
Credits: 13,557
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by fifthofnovember View Post
It's just amazing that people are so ignorant of history and the purpose of the 2nd Amendment. The founding fathers were clear in their writings what the 2nd amendment was intended for: protection against government tyranny, and deterring any invading force. Of course the right to hunt was a given back then, as were most self-evident rights concerning survival in its basic form. "Arms" refers to weapons. Specifically weapons capable of fulfilling the need for protection against all governments, foreign and domestic. Flintlocks don't cut it anymore, and the founders were well aware that technology increases over time. The term "arms" refers to whatever people are using to kill each other these days. So, yes, we have the god-given right to bear hand grenades, tanks, missiles, etc, because the bar is set that high in 2008.
We agree that the 2nd secures all free men's right to bear arms. But please look into what they said and their stances on it to see all the reasons for securing that right.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Tarheeler View Post
This story caught my eye earlier today...

http://www.cnn.com/2008/CRIME/06/16/....ap/index.html

Killing spree with a knife? I thought that was impossible! (/sarcasm)
Oh just wait for the left to pop in here with their arguments. They are frigging hilarious.
__________________
The difference between a Socialist and a Communist is that the Socialist doesn't have all the guns yet.
Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
Red Cross - Donate Today    Save the Rainforest