View Single Post
  #33 (permalink)  
Old 06-17-2008, 12:30 AM
Spare's Avatar
Spare Spare is offline
Analyst
 
Join Date: May 2008
Posts: 3,022
Spare has much to be proud ofSpare has much to be proud ofSpare has much to be proud ofSpare has much to be proud ofSpare has much to be proud ofSpare has much to be proud ofSpare has much to be proud ofSpare has much to be proud ofSpare has much to be proud of
Credits: 15,550
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Sparky Farkas View Post
Oh, Jesus! I'm really confused now. On another thread you said that Iraq was won. Now you're saying we haven't won yet in Iraq. Or maybe we had won when you posted the other post but now we lost what we had won and have to win it back. What was the criteria again for having "won" in Iraq?

I gather from your post above that we went to Iraq for some reason other than the many and varied reasons the Bush Administration said we went. So why when we win will the war in Iraq will the war not be over? I thought when we win a war the war is, you know, won. But you are saying Iraq isn't the end of the war. This is making my head hurt. How does one win a war and the won not be ended? Is this like a Buddhist koan?
Actually, I think the reason your head hurts is because you suffer from being terminally stupid. So ... in little words, just for you ... (in case I lose you, www.dictionary.com)

We are not fighting the government of Iraq .... Iraq is the location that a battle front against Islamic fundamentalists is taking place. In the nether regions of your oh so simplistic mind, try to remember this ... this war is against Islamic terrorists wherever they are, whether that be Iraq, Iran, Palestine, or Chicago. We are being successful against the terrorists in Iraq. Our allies in the Philippines, Malaysia, Indonesia, Pakistan, Afghanistan, England, Spain, and other countries have taken up the battle in other arenas.

(By the way, this is available in the Cliff Notes version ... and, just for our liberal friends, a comic book version)
Reply With Quote