Quote:
Originally Posted by OOOOOOO
It was from you, and we both know it. Obama-bots like to do that. Please, please, please, stay "confident" in your arguments.
Please?
|
Wtf are you talking about? I gave myself a negative rep, makes sense.
Quote:
|
On this compter screen, the way to access the button is to to the "view" button, go down to the sixth option listed, and press "stop".
|
There is no way to access the links I showed you using your stop button. They are archives, not simply a 'stop button'.
Quote:
|
That that site has been criticized before for bias.
|
Thats not what you said. You said:
Quote:
Originally Posted by OOOOOOO
Dumpster diving might help you (he supported Clinton)
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by OOOOOOO
No, it's the fact that he said he supported Hillary Clinton
|
And you have yet to present any evidence of such.
Quote:
|
At various times, he's done both. Every time, he's wrong.
|
Wheres your proof? How does he cherry pick polls without omitting polls? If he includes all polls from his sources he can't be cherry picking anything, he has to exclude some to be 'cherrypicking.
Quote:
|
SurveyUSA is the worst by far of that list when it comes to bias. They've all been wrong, but not as wrong as electoral-vote always been.
|
None of this is evidence or proof of bias.
It is impossible to get to the links I showed by simply using the stop button.
You've given up trying to defend pretty much all your arguments. You no longer claim there is a Hillary bias, that he cherry picks polls, that there is no archive, or that he doesn't use tracking polls.
All you are doing now, is claiming polls in general are not accurate.