View Single Post
  #9 (permalink)  
Old 06-18-2008, 03:54 PM
Raeka's Avatar
Raeka Raeka is offline
Commentator
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: U.S.A
Posts: 968
usa us virginia
Raeka has much to be proud ofRaeka has much to be proud ofRaeka has much to be proud ofRaeka has much to be proud ofRaeka has much to be proud ofRaeka has much to be proud ofRaeka has much to be proud ofRaeka has much to be proud of
Credits: 4,774
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by The Jovial One View Post
Because he's a public official. They are not protected from "libel" and "slander" to the same degree we are.
Not to the same degree, no. But it is still actionable. Especially where there is proven malice. I'd say that that is the case here. Larry Sinclair, if he's lying, is doing so with malice and that is clear. You cannot go around making slanderous statements that have absolutely no truth with impunity about famous people. That is a misconception.

Now if your argument was that Obama did not want to give this more publicity, then that is a better argument.

I am not perpetuating the rumor. I am one of many who are not convinced its just a lie, unlike you. You are an ardent supporter so naturally you are going to support him. I just want more information and then I'll make up my own mind.

I have an open mind and I'd like to know why the media is trying so hard NOT to pay attention.

Last edited by Raeka; 06-18-2008 at 03:55 PM.
Reply With Quote