It wasn't my claim. I already knew before it was posted that 1998 was an unusually hot year. I simply remarked that its humorous how you alarmists like to use 1998 as proof of warming when its convenient, but when the tables are turned its a fluke.

The whole time its just been a bump in the data, but try telling a dellusional enviromentalist that climate is usually measured in 30 year chunks and they go ape-(*)(*)(*)(*). You guys aren't interested in the science unless it agrees with your pre-conceived notions. You guys aren't interested in solving any enviromental problems unless it brings big buisness to its knees. (Nuclear Power is a big no-no in spite of its lack of Co2 expulsions)

So try something Foolosophy, read my posts, and if you want evidence for anything I say, try posting some of your own. I don't see any purpose of wasting my time since you guys never bother to read anything I post.