Quote:
Originally Posted by NoSocialism.com
There's a very specific reason why I used 1998, first of all, 1998 was a spike year, so it supported my argument better.
|
So you admit that if you choose 1997 or 1999 (which have much lower temperature values), THE global cooling claim over the past decade collapses into fraudulant propaganda and psuedo-science.
At least you admit your lies.
But it did take a few posts and graphs from me for you to be cornered and exposed thus forcing you to admit it.
