View Single Post
  #23 (permalink)  
Old 06-22-2008, 05:41 PM
Foolosophy's Avatar
Foolosophy Foolosophy is offline
Banned
Commentator
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Australia
Posts: 1,123
australia
Foolosophy has a spectacular aura aboutFoolosophy has a spectacular aura aboutFoolosophy has a spectacular aura about
Credits: 5,379
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by nosocialism.com View Post




Exposed Once Again With Spin And Political Scientific Data Marketing.

Why do you insert a linear regressional trend line through a data spread spanning for over 100 years ago?

Well the first 70 odd years of data which has cooling periods and minimal warming effects dampens what has happened over the past 40 odd years - WHICH IS WHY YOU PRESENT THE DATA LIKE THAT.

WHAT IS THE INCREASE IN GLOBAL TEMPERATURE OVER THE PAST 40 YEARS? IS IT 0.09F PER DECADE?

The last 3 decades has seen an increase of 0.6 degrees Celsius in global temperature. Thats about 0.2 degC/decade, which is over 6 times HIGHER than the value you present in your spin GRAPH!

The graph also uses the wider spread of data to push the already compressed trend line closer to the horizontal axis so as to gove the impression that the increase is meaningless etc.

GOOD TRY but you need to actually be honest in this debate. Try your propaganda on others

YOU ARE CAUGHT OUT AGAIN AS A SPIN MARKETING AGENT FOR THE FOSSIL FUEL INDUSTRY.

Keep posting your funny humerous graphs that are designed to confuse the public and make them feel that the increase in global temperature is very small.

Last edited by Foolosophy; 06-22-2008 at 06:01 PM.
Reply With Quote