Here's the fourth unanswered request to ABoyNamedSue.
He wrote, "It's insurance for the losers of society. The dregs who would rather spend their money on creature comforts, instead of health insurance. The losers who abuse themselves with alcoholism, drug abuse or cigarette addiction. I think if you would ask successful citizens if they want to spend their tax money on these losers, you'd get a resounding "no." Whenever you hear stories about this socialist health insurance, or read polls, look closely to whom they get their information from. I'll tell you, it ain't gonna be from anyone in the middle-to-upper class. It's gonna be from the losers."
C'mon big mouth. What's your documentation that those without health insurance are "dregs"? (Note: Your moronic opinion doesn't count as documentation.)
What are your sources that Americans with no health insurance are allocating their money to creature comforts? (Note: Your moronic opinion doesn't count as a source.)
What source can you cite that Americans with no health insurance are "losers who abuse themselves with alcoholism, drug abuse or cigarette addiction"? (Note: Your moronic opinion doesn't count as a source.)
You've made these claims before. Back 'em up. Show us your sources. Where's your proof? Or are you just a giant bag of donkey dust that's all rant and no substance?
While you're at it, what about Americans that have a pre-existing condidition and insurance companies refuse to sell to them? If John McCain hadn't spent his life receiving federal health insurance he wouldn't be able to purchase any. Does that make him a "dreg, a loser, a drug addict"?
C'mon big mouth prove your claims.
You only cited someone's opinion. That's not a fact, it's an opinion. You probably don't know the difference between the two. You also didn't answer the challenge to support your absurd claims. I can understand why. There isn't any.
|