View Single Post
  #5 (permalink)  
Old 07-03-2008, 06:43 PM
masterproctor's Avatar
masterproctor masterproctor is offline
Sr. Correspondent
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: AmerikA
Posts: 401
us california
masterproctor has a spectacular aura aboutmasterproctor has a spectacular aura about
Credits: 4,319
Send a message via AIM to masterproctor
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Toby View Post
I think its fair to say that felons should lose some rights. However the constitution doesent define the second amendment that way. And that was the question was about. Not what you think we should do but what the constitution says that we can do!
Granted. But it is a very broad ammendment in the constitution, and I don't have a problem with laws passed by the congress that impose some restrictions on the ability to possess "arms."

Also, I think since arms is a very vague term it must be defined. Since the constitution doesn't really specify who is to define terms in the constitution, I guess I will just have to side with the Marshall court on that particular subject and rely on the judicial branch.
__________________
Signature:
Reply With Quote