Quote:
Originally Posted by KenLay";p="
Quote:
Originally Posted by Sinanju";p="
Ken.. i have tried to reason with you many times and i am going to try one last time my friend...
Bush is not running on his stint in the TANG... Kerry was TRYING to run on his stint in the 'Nam...
|
Bush is running on his character, on his leadership qualities, his honesty, on being a courageous and decisive leader. His Alabama service certainly reflects on his character so it's a fair deal.
Besides do you really think that if Kerry did not mention Vietnam Bush and Swifties would not try to smear his service anyway. It that's what you think - ask John McCain, he did not run on his Vietnam record 4 years ago and still was smeared.
Besides even if Kerry did decide to run on his Vietnam record - it's not an invitation to smear and lie about his service. Critisizing his anti-war testimonies and activities is a fair deal, claiming that he did not deserve his medals without a shred of evidence is not. |
McCain wasn't smeared on his Vietnam record. So your comparison is widely inaccurate. Kerry and his democrat cronies opened this can of worms, now they are unhappy because it's affecting them negatively. I bet they're regretting attacking Bush's guard record now. The public didn't give two craps about it, but Kerry is getting hurt.