Thread: So remind me - why were WMDs such a threat
View Single Post
  #9 (permalink)  
Old 07-04-2008, 01:50 PM
Zaro's Avatar
Zaro Zaro is offline
Guru
  
Join Date: Jun 2008
Posts: 3,490
Zaro has a reputation beyond reputeZaro has a reputation beyond reputeZaro has a reputation beyond reputeZaro has a reputation beyond reputeZaro has a reputation beyond reputeZaro has a reputation beyond reputeZaro has a reputation beyond reputeZaro has a reputation beyond reputeZaro has a reputation beyond reputeZaro has a reputation beyond reputeZaro has a reputation beyond repute
Credits: 13,230
Default
Quote:
Originally Posted by SenaxFlatulus View Post
Paul O'Neil has no genuine proof. It's just his word that you so eagerly swallow and regurgitate simply on the basis that you want to show the administration in the worst possible light. In the end, there's nothing you can offer that proves you to be correct. It's just your opinion.

The President, no matter which party they represent, cannot unilaterally invade a country with no grounds to do so. They have to have support.

You'll find you have to admit to the inevitable fact that Congress voted TWICE to go into Iraq. They insisted on it. Either they were all brainless dupes of the evil diabolical Bushco or they're being duplicitous and you're the dupe for voting them into office. Which one is it?

As far as the fallacy of the "American Corporate media" ... the conspiracy theory threads are in another area of the forum index. Go spew there and leave the REAL debate to the grownups, okay?
O'Neil got grilled by "60 Minutes" and he had the memos, the meeting minutes, the goods.

Bush manipulated the support of the public, which was no great feat given the shock of 9/11

'Course they voted to go. Nobody wants to be unpatriotic in their line of work.

Grownups?? I'm not the one believing Bushco fairy tales
Reply With Quote