http://political-spazz.blogspot.com/...-ron-paul.html

Political Spazz
The Dead can do my sleeping if you know what I mean

Wednesday, December 26, 2007
Ralph Nader vs. Ron Paul
Ralph Nader was threat to the Neo-Liberals in 2004, because he has always been a ‘small d Democrat’, he advocates the idea of ‘one-person, one vote’ rather than ‘one dollar, one vote’. The main enemy of the people is corporate welfare. He hates the politician who takes money and natural resources that belong to ‘we the people’ and sells it out to the highest corporate bidder. Unregulated corporate power is the great enemy.

The strategy by the neo-liberals to eliminate Nader was to ignore him as insignificant, then to marginalize him, then finally to openly attack him. He became the great enemy in splitting the ‘Democratic’ vote, siphoning the leftists out of the party when they were most needed to fight the larger evil Bush. However, the Democratic party was already long gone, presided over by the great neo-liberal Clinton.

Ron Paul is now a threat to the Neo-Conservatives in 2008, because he has always been a ‘small r Republican’, he advocates the idea of a smaller federal government. The main enemy of the people is a large bloated bureaucracy. He also dares to make our Foreign Policy a presidential campaign issue. He is the only candidate running for president who would cut off the billions of dollars in aid we supply to Israel each year.

The strategy by the neo-conservatives to eliminate Paul was to first ignore him as insignificant, then to marginalize him as the Republican parties’ eccentric uncle, and now we are entering the attack him phase.

The difference between Nader and Paul, is that Ron Paul is actually pulling 30% in the Republican primary polls, more than double his nearest adversary. Over the next month he will be smeared and attacked, but his polling numbers will also be suppressed whenever possible. He will continue to be ignored by the mainstream media, desperately trying to make it to February 5th, at which point vote fraud will be used to marginalize him and his followers.

He will be denied the Republican nomination if they can make it believable that Romney or Huckabee is the actually winner of the votes. This would force Paul to run as an Independent, splitting the Republican vote and electing Hillary Clinton, which is completely acceptable for the Neo-Cons, whose most important job is putting the interests of Israel before the United States.

If the groundswell for Ron Paul is too large to suppress using vote fraud and he is swept to the convention floor and nominated as a Republican, then look for a lone nut assassin programmed by the same people who did 9/11 to step in and try to silence him.

This is the challenge we face in this country. The neo-cons and neo-libs have hijacked our country and will use the media and all the dark powers they can muster to prevent a true representative of the United States People from stopping the slide toward fascism, economic depression and subservience to corporate interests (mass consumerism) and being a client state to foreign nations (supplying our boys to fight Israel’s wars in Iraq and Iran).

http://politicalinquirer.com/2007/11...t-of-ron-paul/

NewsGroper
Ralph Nader

Ron Paul: an enema for America

He won’t admit it, but Ron Paul is practically running on my third-party ticket. And while I don’t agree with him on every point. I was impressed that he raised four million dollars in one day. Unless my campaign starts showing some signs of life, I might just vote for him next November.

Sure, I don’t particularly agree with his immigration policy of state-run militia’s running around on the southern border, shooting at anything that speaks Spanish. Nor do I sleep well at night thinking about his proposed dissolution of my precious EPA and Consumer Product Safety Commission. However, I think we can all agree that Washington is like the inflamed colon after 20 years without even a flake of Raisin Bran. What it needs is a Ron Paul enema — lets let it run through the system, clean everything out — You wouldn’t get an enema every day — but we need one right now.


http://thirdpartywatch.com/2008/04/1...r-on-ron-paul/

Ralph Nader, the consumer activist and independent presidential candidate, seems to think that the report of the commission assigned to investigate the events of 9-11 should not be the last word.

“There are unanswered questions in the 9-11 investigation, and they should be answered,” Nader said at a recent address at the National Constitution Center in Philadelphia. “How do you go from plausibility to evidence? You have a more independent inquiry.”

On the morning of September 11, 2001, airliners collided with each of the twin towers of New York City’s World Trade Center, after which they and a third nearby office building mysteriously collapsed. Other incidents on the same day at the Pentagon and in a field in Pennsylvania were also attributed to aircraft collisions. All were pitched by the government as the result of a terrorist conspiracy, although it is widely believed that the government may have played a direct role in orchestrating the events.