View Single Post
  #14 (permalink)  
Old 07-07-2008, 07:56 AM
SpotsCat's Avatar
SpotsCat SpotsCat is offline
Sr. Correspondent
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Jackson, Mississippi
Posts: 549
us mississippi
SpotsCat is a splendid one to beholdSpotsCat is a splendid one to beholdSpotsCat is a splendid one to beholdSpotsCat is a splendid one to beholdSpotsCat is a splendid one to beholdSpotsCat is a splendid one to beholdSpotsCat is a splendid one to behold
Credits: 24,702
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by 0000 View Post
it's an attempt to gain exemption from accountability due to drunkenness. sort of like driving a car and hitting a pedestrian, but then saying to the police officer that it wasn't their fault because they were drunk. they didn't mean any harm. my brother has used this excuse multiple times after engaging in drunken violence. he claims that the alcohol caused him to lose his rational judgment, and therefore he isn't responsible.
What I find amusing about this entire situation, is that someone who admits they were intoxicated when they posted some inflammatory comments - that would seem to give ammunition to anyone who would disagree with them in the future.

Any member who has a difference of opinion with this intoxicated poster, can now dismiss any and all comments they make with a simple "You must be drunk again!" type comment.

Sample conversation --

Quote:
A: George Bush did this, that, and the other, and should be impeached!

B: What do you know? You're drunk again.

A: No I'm not!

B: Whatever...
__________________
"Those are my principles. If you don't like them I have others." - Groucho Marx

Reply With Quote