View Single Post
  #8 (permalink)  
Old 07-18-2008, 10:17 PM
JP5's Avatar
JP5 JP5 is offline
Site Moderator
Guru
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Texas
Posts: 23,732
us texas
JP5 has a reputation beyond reputeJP5 has a reputation beyond reputeJP5 has a reputation beyond reputeJP5 has a reputation beyond reputeJP5 has a reputation beyond reputeJP5 has a reputation beyond reputeJP5 has a reputation beyond reputeJP5 has a reputation beyond reputeJP5 has a reputation beyond reputeJP5 has a reputation beyond reputeJP5 has a reputation beyond repute
Credits: 156,448
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by raytri View Post
Here's a link to the full article for nonsubscribers:
http://online.wsj.com/article/SB1216...googlenews_wsj

It's partly an attempt to skirt the rules, but it's also partly an effort to address what would have been pretty complex reporting and tracking requirements for lobbyists.

In general, though, this isn't good. Ethics rules should be simple, straightforward and tough. I don't like the practice of establishing rules with loud fanfare, then slowly sliding away from them with later, quiet guidance.

Though it's worth noting that the Dems' ethics rules are *still* stricter than what the GOP had in place.
Oh yeah, sure. No more $25 lunches that they apparently could be bought for! <g>
__________________
"What exactly is this foreign policy experience?" Obama said mockingly of the New York senator. "Was she negotiating treaties? Was she handling crises? The answer is no."
Reply With Quote