They being the FBI. And whether or not they are required to tell the truth is irrelevant. He believed it...because he knew it was true. And you do realize they left him on the street until they had enough to charge him. By the way, the DNA must exist because prosecutors won't file charges without evidence.

Quote:

He shared an office. Yes as a matter of fact I have worked in High Security Top Secret government areas and numerous people with the proper clearances are allowed in many different areas. Yes it is completely relevant where else traces of this powder was found. Janitors are also allowed in these areas. A contaminated rag could have been the cause for it being found where it was too, since it has been found in several undisclosed locations! Right, it shouldn't have been found there, or the several other areas it was found, around and near his shared office.

No, numerous people are not allowed in people's office or in labs in high security clearance. That is true about janitors though they tend to be federal employees and operate under supervision. A rag? Yeah a highly trained and experienced scientist used a rag to clean up some anthrax and then just threw it on a shelf in his office. You can't be serious.

Quote:

They have known since 2002 the source of the anthrax was the lab, he and several others had access too. As a side note; They are also now saying that he only had access to liquid anthrax, not the powder. So who is telling the truth here? Probably one of the reasons he was used by the FBI to help investigate the case. By the way, you do not dictate what is or isn’t relevant!

If I determine it to be irrelevant I will say it. Like I did previously. And you mean the story that was allegedly changed?

Quote:

He wasn’t the only person with access? Why do you keep ignoring that fact? If he was the only person with access he would have been arrested in 2002 when they found the contamination in his room. DUH??

Because they couldn't determine it was the same anthrax until now. Adn the same people with access to the lab had access to his office? Prove it.

Quote:

Since there are so many unanswered questions there are obviously several conclusions that could be viable assessments of the facts in there entirety. Your assumptions are based on ignoring relevant facts and concluding that since there is nothing more (other than all the other facts that you choose to ignore) then there can only be one conclusion. Jump to conclusions often Gilligan.

I have no assumptions, I am going by what I read. The assumptions are on your part. You're going from some minor questions = the government did it. LOL, talk about jumping to conclusions. Sounds like the 9/11 crowd.

Quote:

The number one reason for suicide in this country is depression, and/or drug usage.

Yep and people are killing themselves by the droves due to retirement.

Quote:

The highest suicide rate is also among men over the age of 85, who are depressed and feel useless, and have a belief it would be better for everyone around them if they were just dead. These are the same problems this guy has had for a while. He has also discussed with others his intent to kill himself, which is one of the significant signals that someone is unstable, ergo suicidal by definition. On the other hand the majority of people charged with crimes do not kill themselves even though, some do. Even in those cases it isn’t the guilt that does it, it is the helplessness of the situation. So I am not saying he didn’t commit suicide because he might have been guilty, but he was already on the road to suicide long before he was supposedly informed he was going to be charged.

The highest suicide rate in that age group is for men who are old and in physical pain. Retirement plays a very very small part. And no the majority of those charged do not kill themselves, but the majority of those who do kill themselves are as close to 100% guilty as you can get. That's because the innocent fight charges that are untrue. http://www.netdoctor.co.uk/menshealt...ionsuicide.htm
http://findarticles.com/p/articles/m...3/ai_n18616193

Quote:

Which is something curious in itself. They have a person who clinically depressed, on medication, has informed people around him and his doctor that he was suicidal, and has just been released from the hospital for observation from being mentally unstable, and the law contacts him to tell them they are on their way to take him away? Why in the world would they do such a thing? Talk about irresponsible behavior? They may have even contributed to his death by making the call rather than just going and getting the lunatic off the street, since they have "all" this evidence against that raises the suspicions that he is not only a threat to society but himself in general.

It's not their job to check with neighbors that he was suicidal. Another assumption of yours, that they knew.

Quote:

You wouldn’t, but you are the one that keeps trying to turn this into a conspiracy, not me.

Actually that would be you, the one assuming the massive government coverup (conspiracy).

http://www.examiner.com/a-1524165~Do...d_anthrax.html

http://www.examiner.com/a-1524271~Do...d_anthrax.html

And the humdinger But he's innocent!

__________________
All you need to know about the energy crisis:
ANWR Exploration Republicans: 91% Supported. Democrats: 86% Opposed.
Coal-to-liquid R's: 90% YES. D's: 78% NO.
Oil Shale Exploration R's: 90% YES. D's: 86% NO.
Outer Continental Shelf Exploration R's: 81% YES. D's: 83% NO.
Increased Refinery Capacity R's: 97% YES. D's: 96% NO

SUMMARY: 91% of House Republicans have historically voted to increase the production of America’s own oil and gas. 86% of House Democrats have historically voted against.