View Single Post
  #4 (permalink)  
Old 08-21-2008, 11:58 AM
Questerr Questerr is online now
Guru
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: San Antonio
Posts: 3,722
usa us texas
Questerr has a reputation beyond reputeQuesterr has a reputation beyond reputeQuesterr has a reputation beyond reputeQuesterr has a reputation beyond reputeQuesterr has a reputation beyond reputeQuesterr has a reputation beyond reputeQuesterr has a reputation beyond reputeQuesterr has a reputation beyond reputeQuesterr has a reputation beyond reputeQuesterr has a reputation beyond reputeQuesterr has a reputation beyond repute
Credits: 16,742
Default ...

So your country's "retaliation" for a defensive missile interception system that can't even threaten your nuclear deterance is to put an offensive nuclear capable system near the border of a country that isn't even a member of NATO...

Are you guys high?

I ask again NPR, why is Russia so scared of 10 intercepters that can't even hurt your missiles and that you have 1000 times the amount needed to overwhelm anyways?

PS: You do realize that Israel can hit Syria with nuclear artillery or nap-of-the-earth nuclear equipped fighter strikes that totally invalidate this, right?

Edit: Correction, the Iskander isn't even nuclear capable, so this comes down to "who gives a (*)(*)(*)(*)?"
__________________
sputterman: "Aiding the enemy? If the truth aids the enemy then we are in the wrong war."

Last edited by Questerr; 08-21-2008 at 12:00 PM.
Reply With Quote