Quote:
Originally Posted by JP5";p="
Quote:
Originally Posted by Hard-Driver";p="
President Bush is CONSTANTLY talking about the war on terror and the war in Iraq as the same thing. He then is saying that if you disagree with the war in Iraq, then you must conversely be soft on terrorism or are appeasing terrorists, etc. The question is that if the former Iraqi regime had no known links to international terrorist acts, how can the war in Iraq be part of the war on terrorism.
|
Let's recap the history... He not only continued to shoot at our planes, he continued to defy the UN Resolutions, thumbing his nose at the world. After signing onto the Resolutions to save his ass, he reneged on everything he promised to do.
... So yes, it is definitely part of the War On Terrorism. And the world is better off , and safer, without Saddam Hussein in power. Even most of the nations they weren't involved in Iraq have admitted to that fact.  |
Many Americans continue to say Saddam did not comply with U.N. resolutions, but it appears from recent reports that he did comply, years ago (no weapons).
No, I don’t believe the United States, or the world are better off with Saddam in prison. Maybe the Iraqi people are.