Gosh, Glowdog, but you have nothing to say about the fact
1) that this is an old story, recycled for some reason at this time by IAEA.
2) that IAEA inspectors were on this site in MARCH, not January, contrary to their claims.
3) That the site was investigated by U.S. forces at that time, who found no IAEA materials.
Sorry for the cut. I was trying to cut/paste around a big ad in the middle of the page and inadvertently left out part of the article.
I usually try to check for that sort of thing but was trying to run out the door to lunch.
Catz
__________________
I'll get nicer when you get smarter.
|