View Single Post
  #11 (permalink)  
Old 10-27-2004, 12:21 PM
PoliticallyIncorrect PoliticallyIncorrect is offline
Commentator
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Vancouver, BC
Posts: 1,289
PoliticallyIncorrect is on a distinguished road
Credits: 9,158
Default ....

Quote:
Originally Posted by catzmeow";p=&quot View Post
Quote:
But Catz, your ignoring your own post
Even that small amount was FORBIDDEN by the terms of the treaty.

So, it wasn't present in the quantity for mass destruction, but it certainly demonstrates a propensity to flout the requirements of the UN treaty.

Catz
But again - It was secured by the IAEA NOT the Iraqis - the materials technically belonged to the UN, and the Iraqis had to request permission to use it. Saddam did not have his hand in the Al Qa Qaa cookie jar - so to speak - I included links in my other post or better yet, start googling Catz, you'll see what I mean. This was a weapons facility secured by the IAEA but neglected by the US military because it was put as a level 2 priority by the Bush adminstration.

http://www.boston.com/dailynews/301/...unit_at:.shtml

(If you don't like that link, I have others)
__________________
Truth is by nature self-evident, as soon as you remove the cobwebs of ignorance that surround it, it shines clear. Gandhi
Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
Red Cross - Donate Today    Save the Rainforest