What I stated in my original post, at is repeatedly ignored is the fact that the IAEA sealed the explosives, had it protected UNTIL they were asked to leave.
So I put it back to you as again - no proof, link or sources
Can YOU proove that the weapons went missing before or after the 3rd infiltry division arrived to Al Qa Qaa on April 4, 2003?
http://www.abc.net.au/news/newsitems...0/s1229343.htm
Quote:
Last Update: Wednesday, October 27, 2004. 11:19pm (AEST)
Iraq denies explosives disappeared before war
A top Iraqi science official says it is impossible that 350 tonnes of high explosives could have been smuggled out of a military site south of Baghdad before the regime fell last year.
The UN nuclear watchdog this week said the explosives went missing from a weapons dump some time after Saddam Hussein's regime was toppled in April 2003.
But as the issue of the missing explosives took centre stage in the US presidential campaign, some US officials have suggested they had gone before the US-led forces moved on Baghdad.
"It is impossible that these materials could have been taken from this site before the regime's fall," Mohammed al-Sharaa, who heads the Science Ministry's site monitoring department, said.
"The officials that were inside this facility (Al-Qaqaa) beforehand confirm that not even a shred of paper left it before the fall.
"I spoke to them about it and they even issued certified statements to this effect which the US-led coalition was aware of."
Mr Sharaa also warns that other nearby sites with similar materials could have also been plundered.
|
Until YOU can proove that, to say that IAEA was grossly incompetent is inaccurate.
To say that the Bush administration is negligent and incompetent because they don't even know WHEN the weapons were lost, stolen, looted IS accurate - specifically, when this a weapons facility that they were well aware of and was under control since 1991.
So once again - put up or shut up, Sunshine - your stories don''t wash