10-27-2004, 02:17 PM
|
|
Commentator
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Vancouver, BC
Posts: 1,289
|
|
...
Quote:
Originally Posted by barney-fife";p="
"LINKS, SOURCES, QUOTES, PROOF???
LINKS, SOURCES, QUOTES, PROOF???
LINKS, SOURCES, QUOTES, PROOF???
LINKS, SOURCES, QUOTES, PROOF???
LINKS, SOURCES, QUOTES, PROOF???
LINKS, SOURCES, QUOTES, PROOF???"
I believe that would be the burden of those making up these bogus charges. You have to prove something is correct, not disprove it isn't. Lurch is out there making Howard Dean like remarks with absolutely ZERO proof. He only reads the NY Times each morning, gets his marching orders, and pukes out whatever dribble the Times has reported. The Times--they were the ones who fired Liberal editor Howard Raines for using the ostensibly object news pages of the Times to crusade against the war, along with his defense of known plagiarism by Times reporter Jayson Blair.
What a fish-wrap!
PS
In no Times article do they cite the date these explosives were found missing. It is only by implication do they endeavor to make the reader believe it occurred under US occupation.
|
Are you Blind or just Dumb?
Have links in my posts - where are yours?
__________________
Truth is by nature self-evident, as soon as you remove the cobwebs of ignorance that surround it, it shines clear. Gandhi
|