View Single Post
  #23 (permalink)  
Old 10-27-2004, 03:19 PM
PoliticallyIncorrect PoliticallyIncorrect is offline
Commentator
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Vancouver, BC
Posts: 1,289
PoliticallyIncorrect is on a distinguished road
Credits: 9,158
Default ....

Quote:
You, nor Lurch, nor the DNC nor the NY Times has posted ANY shred of proof that the explosives became missing on ANY certain date. And until you do, your claims remain debunked.
So YOU know when they went missing? That's the point - This is a weapons facility THAT was secure until Bush Took over - and NO ONE knows what happened to 380 Tonnes of weapons materials. All we know is that the 3rd Infiltry division saw the boxes AFTER the invasion in April 2003

http://www.guardian.co.uk/worldlates...579362,00.html

Quote:
Q. When did U.S. troops arrive at the site, how aggressively did they search for the weapons and did they secure the facility when they left?

A. The Army's 3rd Infantry Division reached Al-Qaqaa around April 3, 2003, fought with Iraqi forces, occupied the site and left after two days for Baghdad.


Quote:
Here's a thought--how about bringing reserrection to your defense of CBS news, Dan Rather and the forged National Guard documents? How about documenting for us all the world leaders Lurch met with a few months back, claiming he had their support? How about documenting Lurch's claim that he met with the FULL UN Secruity Council, despite the fact no one on the Council has any knowledge of that meeting?
What the hell does this have to do with the price of tea in China? Are you honestly comparing what you suggest as exaggerations WITH LOSING weapons to Insurgents?

Barney - you're shooting blanks here buddy, you haven't knocked anyone up with your angle - I suggest you actually investigate your position rather than regurgitate FOX news crap
__________________
Truth is by nature self-evident, as soon as you remove the cobwebs of ignorance that surround it, it shines clear. Gandhi
Reply With Quote