View Single Post
  #9 (permalink)  
Old 11-05-2004, 12:03 PM
raytri's Avatar
raytri raytri is online now
Site Moderator
Guru
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Minnesota
Age: 41
Posts: 18,536
usa us minnesota
raytri has a reputation beyond reputeraytri has a reputation beyond reputeraytri has a reputation beyond reputeraytri has a reputation beyond reputeraytri has a reputation beyond reputeraytri has a reputation beyond reputeraytri has a reputation beyond reputeraytri has a reputation beyond reputeraytri has a reputation beyond reputeraytri has a reputation beyond reputeraytri has a reputation beyond repute
Credits: 115,823
Default Actually, it is

Quote:
Originally Posted by Rebellion";p=&quot View Post
Social security privatization is not spending.
Actually, I think it is. I was mistaken earlier, when I thought this was simply a bookkeeping problem. The $1 trillion to $2 trillion is what the government will have to pay current retirees for benefits that are no longer being paid by the contributions of current workers. It's the cost of transitioning from a "current workers support current retirees" plan to a "current workers control their own retirement money" plan.
__________________
Man up.
Reply With Quote