Quote:
Originally Posted by Liberty";p="
Quote:
Originally Posted by wannabemp";p="
Accidental or non-accidental, high crime rate or not, whatever the answers 43x is far more than it should be don't you agree?
|
Exactly right, this number is WAY higher than it should be, due to poor research and twisting of results. If you read about how this study was conducted, you will see that somewhere around 80% of the purported accidental deaths were in fact suicides. That takes 43 down to 9 right there. Now if you were to account for the other problems with that statistic I listed, you will find you have a very, very low number.
Quote:
Originally Posted by wannabemp";p="
Even if these statistcs were taken from an LA ghetto it would still be far more deaths than there ever should have been of innocent people because one member of the family chooses to have a loaded weapon in their house.
|
Just because you say so? ROFL-great argument. Sorry that real science doesn't bear the same fruit as the junk stats from your dad. |
OH so that's ok then if they're suicides? We can eliminate those people from the statistic because hell, what do they matter?
How comes if someone gives you a number that you don't like you dissect it and claim its inaccuracy? If you're going to throw statistics into the forum and expect us to accept them as valid, you should at least have the dignity to do the same to those who don't agree with you.