Political Forum
     

Go Back   Political Forum > Political Issues > Human Rights


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #151 (permalink)  
Old 08-21-2008, 05:26 PM
Inferno's Avatar
Inferno Inferno is offline
Guru
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: River STYX
Posts: 4,967
Inferno has a reputation beyond reputeInferno has a reputation beyond reputeInferno has a reputation beyond reputeInferno has a reputation beyond reputeInferno has a reputation beyond reputeInferno has a reputation beyond reputeInferno has a reputation beyond reputeInferno has a reputation beyond reputeInferno has a reputation beyond reputeInferno has a reputation beyond reputeInferno has a reputation beyond repute
Credits: -331
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by WafflesFTW View Post
uh, duh? He/She is a teenager.... Your point?
Maybe the guy should have thought to wear a condom. Hmmmm how the hell hard is that.
__________________
Bill Ayers for Secretary of Education
The first duty of a revolutionary is to get away with it. Abbie Hoffman
Imagine no possesions, I wonder if you can, No need for greed or hunger, A brotherhood of man. Imagine all the people Sharing all the world. John Lennon
I've been smiling lately, dreaming about the world as one. And I believe it could be someday it's going to come. Cat Stevens
Member: Bottom feeders Local 101
Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
Red Cross - Donate Today    Save the Rainforest
  #152 (permalink)  
Old 08-21-2008, 05:45 PM
WafflesFTW WafflesFTW is offline
Correspondent
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: NJ, USA
Posts: 233
us new jersey
WafflesFTW will become famous soon enough
Credits: 1,168
Default

Maybe he did?
Reply With Quote
  #153 (permalink)  
Old 08-21-2008, 08:29 PM
galaxguy galaxguy is offline
Correspondent
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Posts: 271
galaxguy will become famous soon enough
Credits: 1,400
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by rsay32 View Post
The woman doesn't force the man to do anything. He made his choice to accept fatherhood as a potential risk when he chose to have sex. Men already enjoy too much freedom when it comes to fatherhood. The woman gives birth, cares for and raises the child, while we, if we so choose, are legally obligated to provide financial support and nothing more. We do not have to change our lifestyle in the slightest so other than a financial concern, we are free.

To do as you suggest would remove any and all male obligation to participate in the raising of his offspring. We have far too many struggling, single mothers as it is without giving the deadbeats more of an excuse to walk away.
And the woman didn't choose the risks of motherhood when she choose to have sex with the man? Never has a double standard been more apparent.
Why does the man have to choose at the begining, is the woman somehow less responsable for the sex?
Reply With Quote
  #154 (permalink)  
Old 08-21-2008, 08:31 PM
galaxguy galaxguy is offline
Correspondent
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Posts: 271
galaxguy will become famous soon enough
Credits: 1,400
Default

What about the mans right to have a child. Check out this quote.

"A father's interest in having a child--perhaps his only child--may be unmatched by any other interest in his life. It is truly surprising that the state must assign a greater value to a mother's decision to cut off a potential human life by abortion than to a father's decision to let it mature into a live child." -William H. Rehnquist
Reply With Quote
  #155 (permalink)  
Old 08-21-2008, 08:33 PM
WafflesFTW WafflesFTW is offline
Correspondent
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: NJ, USA
Posts: 233
us new jersey
WafflesFTW will become famous soon enough
Credits: 1,168
Default

Because men biologically can't have their own child (in their bodies). Find a surrogate mother I suppose.
Reply With Quote
  #156 (permalink)  
Old 08-21-2008, 08:37 PM
galaxguy galaxguy is offline
Correspondent
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Posts: 271
galaxguy will become famous soon enough
Credits: 1,400
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by WafflesFTW View Post
Because men biologically can't have their own child (in their bodies). Find a surrogate mother I suppose.
But the baby came (in part) from the man's DNA. If it was just a part of the mothers body, we wouldn't need sex. Therefore, not only is it part of the womans body, but also the mans.
Reply With Quote
  #157 (permalink)  
Old 08-21-2008, 08:43 PM
WafflesFTW WafflesFTW is offline
Correspondent
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: NJ, USA
Posts: 233
us new jersey
WafflesFTW will become famous soon enough
Credits: 1,168
Default

It's inside and deriving resources from the woman and not the man. My point stands.
Reply With Quote
  #158 (permalink)  
Old 08-21-2008, 08:44 PM
galaxguy galaxguy is offline
Correspondent
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Posts: 271
galaxguy will become famous soon enough
Credits: 1,400
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by WafflesFTW View Post
It's inside and deriving resources from the woman and not the man. My point stands.
If a tape worm gets in your stomach it is inside you and deriving resources from you. Does that make it part of your body?
Reply With Quote
  #159 (permalink)  
Old 08-21-2008, 08:50 PM
WafflesFTW WafflesFTW is offline
Correspondent
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: NJ, USA
Posts: 233
us new jersey
WafflesFTW will become famous soon enough
Credits: 1,168
Default

No it doesn't. That's why I would have it removed. I know that the fetus is seperate from the woman if that's what you are getting at. In your scenario, you are advocating that the partner of the afflicted have a say in whether or not to keep the tapeworm in or remove it, like you know those women in africa.
Reply With Quote
  #160 (permalink)  
Old 08-21-2008, 08:58 PM
galaxguy galaxguy is offline
Correspondent
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Posts: 271
galaxguy will become famous soon enough
Credits: 1,400
Default

Earlier you cited this as justification for the womans choice.

Quote:
Because men biologically can't have their own child (in their bodies). Find a surrogate mother I suppose.
Quote:
It's inside and deriving resources from the woman and not the man. My point stands.
and here you just agreed with me that the fetus is not a part of the womans body.

Quote:
Originally Posted by WafflesFTW View Post
No it doesn't. That's why I would have it removed. I know that the fetus is seperate from the woman if that's what you are getting at. In your scenario, you are advocating that the partner of the afflicted have a say in whether or not to keep the tapeworm in or remove it, like you know those women in africa.
A tape worm does not have the potential to turn into a human, the fetus does.

That brings us back to the question. The baby is just as much the mans as it is the womans. Why should the state put more weight into the womans desire to end a potential life, then into the man's desire to see it grow into a life?
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off
Forum Jump

Sponsored Links

All times are GMT -8. The time now is 10:12 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.1
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
LinkBacks Enabled by vBSEO 3.1.0
Template-Modifikationen durch TMS
vBCredits v1.3 ©2007 by Darkwaltz4
Advertisement System V2.1 By   Branden