![]() |
|
| Sponsored Links |
| Red Cross - Donate Today Save the Rainforest |
|
|||
|
Quote:
Why does the man have to choose at the begining, is the woman somehow less responsable for the sex? |
|
|||
|
What about the mans right to have a child. Check out this quote.
"A father's interest in having a child--perhaps his only child--may be unmatched by any other interest in his life. It is truly surprising that the state must assign a greater value to a mother's decision to cut off a potential human life by abortion than to a father's decision to let it mature into a live child." -William H. Rehnquist |
|
|||
|
But the baby came (in part) from the man's DNA. If it was just a part of the mothers body, we wouldn't need sex. Therefore, not only is it part of the womans body, but also the mans.
|
|
|||
|
If a tape worm gets in your stomach it is inside you and deriving resources from you. Does that make it part of your body?
|
|
|||
|
No it doesn't. That's why I would have it removed. I know that the fetus is seperate from the woman if that's what you are getting at. In your scenario, you are advocating that the partner of the afflicted have a say in whether or not to keep the tapeworm in or remove it, like you know those women in africa.
|
|
|||
|
Earlier you cited this as justification for the womans choice.
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
That brings us back to the question. The baby is just as much the mans as it is the womans. Why should the state put more weight into the womans desire to end a potential life, then into the man's desire to see it grow into a life? |
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
| Sponsored Links |
|