Originally Posted by Rokerijdude11";p=&quot

So what of two planes flying into a set of Buildings that was designed to take "Multiple" hits from COMMERCIAL airliners?

Originally Posted by Rokerijdude11";p=&quot

BTW it is NO Co-incidence that Company Controlled demolition Incorporated IN FACT was on scene the morning of 9-11..............

Originally Posted by Metrophobe";p=&quot

Link please?
http://www.answers.com/library/Encyc...-cid-781731751

Given the proximity of the Twin Towers to two major airports, each tower was built to withstand the impact of a Boeing 707 aircraft.


http://www.graduatingengineer.com/ar...01-11-02a.html

As the engineers and architects of the World Trade Center Towers began their work some 30 years ago, they feared that a similar disaster could occur. So they imagined what would happen if a 707 (the largest airliner of the day) were to strike into the side of a tower and designed accordingly. Their findings: the structure would remain sound; the towers would stand. “It was more of an academic exercise at the time frankly,” says Ron Klemencic, chairman of the Council on Tall Buildings and Urban Habitat, an international organization of engineering, architectural and construction professionals who help set up international guidelines for skyscraper design. “No one really thought that someone was going to crash an airplane into the side of the building.”




Link please?

Originally Posted by Rokerijdude11";p=&quot

BTW it is NO Co-incidence that Company Controlled demolition Incorporated IN FACT was on scene the morning of 9-11..............

Originally Posted by Rokerijdude11";p=&quot

and based on your airplane theory what then sir happened to Building number seven which was NOT struck BY ANY aircraft at all?

Originally Posted by nawbut";p=&quot

So..what you are trying to tell me is that the people who flew the planes were employees of the same demolition Company? That they were working together?

No sir where is that I am telling you that? all i said is they were there they were hired instantly to remove the rubble...and were also involved with the federal building in murrah as well .....another co-incidence? perhaps

It spontaneously combusted, obviously.

spontaneously combusted and then Collapsed within its own footprint?
are you serious ? first of all there has NEVER been a steel beamed structure to collapse due to "FIRE" Ever anywhere...............yet that day not one....not two......but THREE buildings all collapsed from fires?
All 3 were steel beamed structures? And all of them fell within theyre footprints? In 12 seconds ....."free fall"..... speeds!! all without the help of explosives?


Buildings do not fall at freefall speeds following the path of most resistance without being "helped"



(or maybe the falling buildings didnt just land squarely on their own foundations without disturbing the shrubbery off to the side?).

Originally Posted by Rokerijdude11";p=&quot

http://www.whatreallyhappened.com/IM...demolition.wmv

Molten steel was found “three, four, and five weeks later, when the rubble was being removed [from WTCs 1 & 2],” Loizeaux said. He said molten steel was also found at 7 WTC, which collapsed mysteriously in the late afternoon. [American Free Press]