Closed Thread
+ Post New Thread
Page 1 of 55 1234511 ... LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 546

Thread: Flight 93 recovered underground?

  1. Default Flight 93 recovered underground?

    I keep trying to find some evidence that Flight 93 was buried underground and that it was recovered. It is claimed that 93 was recovered 40 plus feet down. We've never been shown any evidence of this. Anyone who has some, please show it to us. If all you can present is a hole, with dime sized dots of grey something, please post that too. I'm trying to figure out how they determined that it was 95% recovered. We should be able to arrive at around 95% or so of the "official" weight of a 747. I'm wondering if that 95% was all dime sized pieces, or if there might be something a bit bigger, or if they just weighed all the little dots and pronounced it 95% complete.
    Thanks.

  2. Default

    1 min clip,

    see the 15sec to the 35 sec mark.

    Explains fully how they found it underground.


    [ame="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7wAnVuWuFQI"]Frontios had the same problem[/ame]


    things were always buried for some reason
    Last edited by Kokomojojo; Jul 14 2011 at 07:05 AM.
    .
    NEO: Why do my eyes hurt?.......
    MORPHEUS: Its the first time you've used them.

    Yesterdays Tinfoil is Today's Reality!
    Explosives? Thermate? Molten Iron? "NIST" Couldnt Find Their Ass if Their Fingers Were Stuck in it!



  3. #3
    Location: Southeast USA
    Posts: 62,129
    My Latest Mood: Amused

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by RtWngaFraud View Post
    I keep trying to find some evidence that Flight 93 was buried underground and that it was recovered. It is claimed that 93 was recovered 40 plus feet down. We've never been shown any evidence of this. Anyone who has some, please show it to us. If all you can present is a hole, with dime sized dots of grey something, please post that too. I'm trying to figure out how they determined that it was 95% recovered. We should be able to arrive at around 95% or so of the "official" weight of a 747. I'm wondering if that 95% was all dime sized pieces, or if there might be something a bit bigger, or if they just weighed all the little dots and pronounced it 95% complete.
    Thanks.
    Really? Have you been excavating the site?

  4. Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Margot View Post
    Really? Have you been excavating the site?

    there is a pic of the engine that was found underground in the gubbermint exhibit records. LOL

    I am sure candy can post it for you it.
    .
    NEO: Why do my eyes hurt?.......
    MORPHEUS: Its the first time you've used them.

    Yesterdays Tinfoil is Today's Reality!
    Explosives? Thermate? Molten Iron? "NIST" Couldnt Find Their Ass if Their Fingers Were Stuck in it!



  5. Default

    Here's a picture of an engine at the crash site:

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Flight93Engine.jpg

    Here's a piece of the fuselage:

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:P200061.jpg

    ... and it was a 757, not a 747.

  6. Default

    Quote Originally Posted by RtWngaFraud View Post
    It is claimed that 93 was recovered 40 plus feet down.
    Where has it been claimed?
    This Speech is my recital.

  7. Default

    Quote Originally Posted by RtWngaFraud View Post
    I keep trying to find some evidence that Flight 93 was buried underground and that it was recovered. It is claimed that 93 was recovered 40 plus feet down. We've never been shown any evidence of this. Anyone who has some, please show it to us. If all you can present is a hole, with dime sized dots of grey something, please post that too. I'm trying to figure out how they determined that it was 95% recovered. We should be able to arrive at around 95% or so of the "official" weight of a 747. I'm wondering if that 95% was all dime sized pieces, or if there might be something a bit bigger, or if they just weighed all the little dots and pronounced it 95% complete.
    Thanks.
    I've seen drunks weave less than this. Grab the wheel and straighten that fail-mobile out.

  8. #8

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by RtWngaFraud View Post
    Flight 93 recovered underground?
    Nope. At least I haven't seen any evidence that comes close to supporting that.

  9. #9

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by bigcrash View Post
    Here's a picture of an engine at the crash site: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Flight93Engine.jpg
    I think RtWngaFraud showed how that engine was planted -- hint: it's right next to the engine. It explains why that's the only piece of debris seen being dug out of the ground even though 80 percent of the 757 was supposedly in the ground!

    Here's a piece of the fuselage: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:P200061.jpg
    He's talking about parts recovered underground. I have a question though, where was this piece found -- like specifically?
    Last edited by suede; Jul 14 2011 at 11:02 AM.

  10. Default

    Investigators last night found the cockpit voice recorder from United Flight 93, a discovery that could help authorities determine what happened in the final seconds before the hijacked Boeing 757 crashed in Somerset County.

    The discovery of the recorder is important because what it recorded may shed more light on a growing theory that passengers aboard the plane struggled with the hijackers and may have prevented them from hitting a target in Washington, D.C.

    The cockpit voice recorder, one of two black boxes aboard the plane, was found 25 feet below ground in the crater created when the plane struck the ground in Stonycreek.
    http://www.post-gazette.com/headline...kbox0915p3.asp

Closed Thread
+ Post New Thread
Page 1 of 55 1234511 ... LastLast

Tags for this Thread

Bookmarks

Bookmarks