Thread: Dr. Judy Wood Ph.D, Materials Science, 9/11, & Directed Energy Weapons

Originally Posted by Emmanuel_Goldstein

What is the motivation for deception?
Dr. Judy Wood Ph.D, Materials Science, 9/11, & Directed Energy Weapons

It's a beautiful sunny and cool day which is perfect for cleaning windows so I can view my world more clearly. If you see Kay Ewe, give her my best!

I don't know. Why don't you call up your hero Wood and ask her why she tries to deceive the weak minded and the gullible? Please let us know what her response is. I am betting her reason for deception is to make a buck by getting lackeys to push her books on forums.

Originally Posted by Emmanuel_Goldstein

What is the motivation for deception?

Obviously to sell books so Judy can afford her medication.

Originally Posted by Emmanuel_Goldstein

If you see Kay Ewe

Right back at you, Jerry.

Originally Posted by Emmanuel_Goldstein

What is the motivation for deception?
Dr. Judy Wood Ph.D, Materials Science, 9/11, & Directed Energy Weapons

It's a beautiful sunny and cool day which is perfect for cleaning windows so I can view my world more clearly. If you see Kay Ewe, give her my best!

I wouldn't call it deception. I would call it delusion. I have no doubt she believes what she says even if it is counter to the facts. Besides, people like you will buy (or prostitute) the book. Good for the bank account you know.

Dr. Judy Wood and the future of the earth: Part I
By Eric Larsen
Posted on May 10, 2012 by Eric Larsen

Everyone knows what’s wrong with the poor remnant of news and analysis that the mainstream media still manages to provide—that it’s untrue, servile to its corporate masters, and intended to deceive rather than reveal.

But what about the alternative? What about the commentary, analysis, and editorializing that’s available mainly (or only) on the Internet, where the “free” worlds of speech and journalism still exist? How insightful are the writers there—and how reliable?

http://www.intrepidreport.com/archives/5850

Originally Posted by Patriot911

I don't know. Why don't you call up your hero Wood and ask her why she tries to deceive the weak minded and the gullible? Please let us know what her response is. I am betting her reason for deception is to make a buck by getting lackeys to push her books on forums.

Originally Posted by Hannibal

Obviously to sell books so Judy can afford her medication.

Originally Posted by Hoosier8

Wood is just another nutcase.

Originally Posted by Hoosier8

I wouldn't call it deception. I would call it delusion. I have no doubt she believes what she says even if it is counter to the facts. Besides, people like you will buy (or prostitute) the book. Good for the bank account you know.

Evidence is evidence. You can analyze it, ignore it, form conclusions about it, form opinions about it, but you cannot PRODUCE evidence FROM opinions.

If you have formed your own opinion about what has happened based on reviewing the evidence and if your opinion contradicts the evidence, it is not the evidence that is wrong; it’s your own opinion that's wrong. Evidence cannot be wrong. It can be wrongly interpreted, to be sure; and it can be incomplete. However, the issue of incompleteness applies in spades to the official attempts to explain 9/11; yet, debunkers seem willing, on a grand scale, to overlook that incompleteness, even though the incompleteness factor has been openly acknowledged, admitted and otherwise disclosed. The overwhelming & indisputable evidence contained in Dr. Judy Wood's textbook only leads to ONE conclusion. The World Trade Center complex was "dustified" by a Directed Energy Weapon. End of story.


Another beautiful day awaits me. I need to eat my high protein breakfast, shower and get to the gym for my 3 hour work out. Have a wonderful day y'all!

Originally Posted by Emmanuel_Goldstein

but you cannot PRODUCE evidence FROM opinions.

That's exactly what Wood does. She looked at a few pictures, opined that the pictures showed the "dustification" of steel, and drew conclusions based on those opinions. Included in those conclusions was the opinion that most of the dust flew away and is unaccounted for, since samples of dust do not contain enough steel to support her opinion.

On the other side of the argument, we take Judy's claims and show them to be false with actual data. Steel does not turn to dust without reacting with its environment. It's pyrophoric. This is fundamental property of iron within the steel that is not opinion, but established fact. There is no record of this reaction of steel with its environment so we can be sure that Judy's conclusions based on her opinion of dustification are quite false.

That's not my opinion. That's a fact that has yet to be disputed by anyone in the Judy camp.

Originally Posted by Emmanuel_Goldstein

Evidence is evidence. You can analyze it, ignore it, form conclusions about it, form opinions about it, but you cannot PRODUCE evidence FROM opinions.

If you have formed your own opinion about what has happened based on reviewing the evidence and if your opinion contradicts the evidence, it is not the evidence that is wrong; it’s your own opinion that's wrong. Evidence cannot be wrong. It can be wrongly interpreted, to be sure; and it can be incomplete. However, the issue of incompleteness applies in spades to the official attempts to explain 9/11; yet, debunkers seem willing, on a grand scale, to overlook that incompleteness, even though the incompleteness factor has been openly acknowledged, admitted and otherwise disclosed. The overwhelming & indisputable evidence contained in Dr. Judy Wood's textbook only leads to ONE conclusion. The World Trade Center complex was "dustified" by a Directed Energy Weapon. End of story.


Another beautiful day awaits me. I need to eat my high protein breakfast, shower and get to the gym for my 3 hour work out. Have a wonderful day y'all!

Yep, the evidence is not wrong, that is why Judy is wrong. Have a good conspiratorial day!

Originally Posted by Emmanuel_Goldstein

Evidence is evidence. You can analyze it, ignore it, form conclusions about it, form opinions about it, but you cannot PRODUCE evidence FROM opinions.

If you have formed your own opinion about what has happened based on reviewing the evidence and if your opinion contradicts the evidence, it is not the evidence that is wrong; it’s your own opinion that's wrong. Evidence cannot be wrong. It can be wrongly interpreted, to be sure; and it can be incomplete. However, the issue of incompleteness applies in spades to the official attempts to explain 9/11; yet, debunkers seem willing, on a grand scale, to overlook that incompleteness, even though the incompleteness factor has been openly acknowledged, admitted and otherwise disclosed. The overwhelming & indisputable evidence contained in Dr. Judy Wood's textbook only leads to ONE conclusion. The World Trade Center complex was "dustified" by a Directed Energy Weapon. End of story.


Another beautiful day awaits me. I need to eat my high protein breakfast, shower and get to the gym for my 3 hour work out. Have a wonderful day y'all!

What evidence does she base her cal;ling dust kicked up by the boots of rescue workers as 'fuming'?


And you're doing something wrong if you need to spend three hours working out.....unless of course you want to be the next mr olympia...

Deception.jpg

Originally Posted by Fangbeer

That's exactly what Wood does. She looked at a few pictures, opined that the pictures showed the "dustification" of steel, and drew conclusions based on those opinions. Included in those conclusions was the opinion that most of the dust flew away and is unaccounted for, since samples of dust do not contain enough steel to support her opinion. On the other side of the argument, we take Judy's claims and show them to be false with actual data. Steel does not turn to dust without reacting with its environment. It's pyrophoric. This is fundamental property of iron within the steel that is not opinion, but established fact. There is no record of this reaction of steel with its environment so we can be sure that Judy's conclusions based on her opinion of dustification are quite false. That's not my opinion. That's a fact that has yet to be disputed by anyone in the Judy camp.

Site the specific Chapter, section, and page number from Dr. Judy Wood's textbook that you make your opinion from. Ignorance is a choice.

Originally Posted by Hoosier8

Yep, the evidence is not wrong, that is why Judy is wrong. Have a good conspiratorial day!

If you doubt the overwhelming and indisputable evidence found in Dr. Judy Wood's textbook, I suggest you read it. Ignorance is a choice.

Originally Posted by LoneStrSt8

What evidence does she base her cal;ling dust kicked up by the boots of rescue workers as 'fuming'? And you're doing something wrong if you need to spend three hours working out.....unless of course you want to be the next mr olympia...

Your repeated silly and childish abuse of this forum is getting ridiculous. Why do you continue to thumb your nose at the administrators and moderators of this forum by posting comments that are inflammatory with the intent to disrupt and distract? The reason why it takes me three hours to work out is because I do three sets on each weight machine and two circuits starting with the upper muscle group followed by the mid section and ending with the lower group. Each circuit takes about 1.5 hours to complete depending on how busy the gym is. I also apply a transdermal testosterone gel before my work out routine. What's wrong with looking attractive? I'm turning a lot of heads from both sexes and a wide range of age groups. If you have a question about the overwhelming and indisputable evidence found in Dr. Judy Wood's textbook, I suggest you read it. Ignorance is a choice.

Originally Posted by Emmanuel_Goldstein

Deception.jpg

Site the specific Chapter, section, and page number from Dr. Judy Wood's textbook that you make your opinion from. Ignorance is a choice.


If you doubt the overwhelming and indisputable evidence found in Dr. Judy Wood's textbook, I suggest you read it. Ignorance is a choice.



Your repeated silly and childish abuse of this forum is getting ridiculous. Why do you continue to thumb your nose at the administrators and moderators of this forum by posting comments that are inflammatory with the intent to disrupt and distract? The reason why it takes me three hours to work out is because I do three sets on each weight machine and two circuits starting with the upper muscle group followed by the mid section and ending with the lower group. Each circuit takes about 1.5 hours to complete depending on how busy the gym is. I also apply a transdermal testosterone gel before my work out routine. What's wrong with looking attractive? I'm turning a lot of heads from both sexes and a wide range of age groups. If you have a question about the overwhelming and indisputable evidence found in Dr. Judy Wood's textbook, I suggest you read it. Ignorance is a choice.

You must have a stake in selling this book since all you do is hawk it.