Thread: Debunking 911 Lies

Are 911 debunkers scripted?

Is it just my imagination or do these so called debunkers just have a debunker playbook that if truther says "a" debunker responds with "c" and so forth and so on?

Ever notice how they always have "FACTS", not evidence like the rest of the world? Yet the greater majority of said "FACTS" are lucky if they rank as 1/2 truths? If any truth at all.

Ever notice what happens when they have to answer the questions or they are taken off script? You can hear a pin drop. shhhh.

Had anyone ever asked if these debunkers made it past intermediate school?

Why is it they just cannot seem to get 101, well in some cases high school physics? Whats up with that?

Anyone out here can help me understand "debunkers" because most of the time it seems like its about word games to them rather than science.

Maybe if I understood them better we could all just get along.

Originally Posted by Kokomojojo

Are 911 debunkers scripted?

Is it just my imagination or do these so called debunkers just have a debunker playbook that if truther says "a" debunker responds with "c" and so forth and so on?

Ever notice how they always have "FACTS", not evidence like the rest of the world? Yet the greater majority of said "FACTS" are lucky if they rank as 1/2 truths? If any truth at all.

Ever notice what happens when they have to answer the questions or they are taken off script? You can hear a pin drop. shhhh.

Had anyone ever asked if these debunkers made it past intermediate school?

Why is it they just cannot seem to get 101, well in some cases high school physics? Whats up with that?

Anyone out here can help me understand "debunkers" because most of the time it seems like its about word games to them rather than science.

Maybe if I understood them better we could all just get along.

I think you understand them very well! The "official" must be pushed....period. That's the agenda. Anything that interferes or differs with that "official" BS, must be attacked, stopped, at all costs. Honest discussion must be halted and the "official" BS must be substituted. The script is pretty tight and intolerance is not only accepted...it's encouraged. Specifics are ALWAYS a problem, and when specifics get too "specific", personal attacks are approved and encouraged. Ignoring problem areas are required and open discussion of problem areas is to be interrupted, discontinued, interfered with, attacked, and ridiculed.
Yes...I think you have a pretty good handle on the "official" side of debunking.

Originally Posted by Kokomojojo

Are 911 debunkers scripted?

No. Not that you would ever accept any evidence on that issue, because your mind is made up.

Is it just my imagination or do these so called debunkers just have a debunker playbook that if truther says "a" debunker responds with "c" and so forth and so on?

It's not my fault the 9/11 Deniers keep repeating the same easily debunked horse(*)(*)(*)(*) for a decade now.

You're saying 2+2=6. The fact that people always respond by saying, "No, you klod, it's 4," does not mean they're scripted. It just means there is an objective right answer to your query, and they have it.

Ever notice how they always have "FACTS", not evidence like the rest of the world? Yet the greater majority of said "FACTS" are lucky if they rank as 1/2 truths? If any truth at all.

Facts are evidence.

Ever notice what happens when they have to answer the questions or they are taken off script? You can hear a pin drop. shhhh.

Can you provide an example of this? Of course you can't.

Had anyone ever asked if these debunkers made it past intermediate school?

Yes, many people have, and various people outside your 9/11 Denier cult have responded with their qualifications. You simply choose not to believe them.

And then you perform this classic bit of 9/11 Denier nonsense: State a lie, but put a question mark at the end of it, so it doesn't seem like a lie.

Why is it they just cannot seem to get 101, well in some cases high school physics? Whats up with that?

Case in point. Obviously, it's a flat-out lie that no one outside your cult has taken physics. In fact, I have previously told you, very recently, that I in fact took physics far into my university studies. But, like all reality, you deny, deny, deny, and continue to present lies like this in the form of questions.

Anyone out here can help me understand "debunkers" because most of the time it seems like its about word games to them rather than science.

LOL... And what, exactly, have you presented as science? Bad animated gifs? YouTube videos?

The science is so ridiculously settled that most of us have moved on. If you're not accepting the science by now, you never will, because you have a pathology that will prevent you from doing so: out-of-control confirmation bias.

Maybe if I understood them better we could all just get along.

We won't get along until 9/11 Deniers accept reality, the reality that they are wrong.

Ever notice what happens when they have to answer the questions or they are taken off script? You can hear a pin drop. shhhh


That's because 'taking it off script' usually entails making a claim so ludicrous,that it takes a while to get over our amazement that they actually made the claim.

Originally Posted by LoneStrSt8

Ever notice what happens when they have to answer the questions or they are taken off script? You can hear a pin drop. shhhh


That's because 'taking it off script' usually entails making a claim so ludicrous,that it takes a while to get over our amazement that they actually made the claim.

True. It took me a good few months to even figure out what the hell the "no plane"/hologram people were even saying, they are so far in another realm of existence.

I think it's the majority of truthers that are clearly scripted.

They regurgitate talking points.
Look no further then Emmanuel Goldstein. That guy copies whole web pages into his post without any unique commentary. RWF and Koko are both guilty of starting threads with nothing more then a sentence and a link to a page they haven't even read. They are not alone.

They are clearly not familiar with the positions they are supporting
Micro nukes
Energy weapons.
Gravity
Kinetics
Structural mechanics
Chemistry
etc.

They can not manage to stay on topic, deliver an original cogent point, or rebut the majority of obvious contradictions in their arguments. The only guy arguing here that I think even tries to hold his own only comes here to argue that the government doesn't have a lot of corroborating intelligence on the funding and planning stages of the event, which is for the most part, true.

Originally Posted by Fangbeer

I think it's the majority of truthers that are clearly scripted.

Do you have any proof?

Originally Posted by BullsLawDan

True. It took me a good few months to even figure out what the hell the "no plane"/hologram people were even saying, they are so far in another realm of existence.

you are kidding right?


Is this a plane? Simple yes or no will do.

Originally Posted by Fangbeer

I think it's the majority of truthers that are clearly scripted.

They regurgitate talking points.
Look no further then Emmanuel Goldstein. That guy copies whole web pages into his post without any unique commentary. RWF and Koko are both guilty of starting threads with nothing more then a sentence and a link to a page they haven't even read. They are not alone.

They are clearly not familiar with the positions they are supporting
Micro nukes
Energy weapons.
Gravity
Kinetics
Structural mechanics
Chemistry
etc.

They can not manage to stay on topic, deliver an original cogent point, or rebut the majority of obvious contradictions in their arguments. The only guy arguing here that I think even tries to hold his own only comes here to argue that the government doesn't have a lot of corroborating intelligence on the funding and planning stages of the event, which is for the most part, true.

I tend to agree, especially on the bolded. I have my own problems on that front, but my issues are more with the potential involvement from a couple of foreign governments. I firmly believe the US government is doing some whitewashing on that front.

Then again, that kind of topic isn't sexy, especially if you can't post some moronic photoshopped image or a youtube vid.

Originally Posted by Kokomojojo

you are kidding right?

No, I'm not kidding. It took me quite a while to wrap my head around someone so completely "out there" they seriously think that no planes hit the WTC.

Is this a plane? Simple yes or no will do

I can't answer the question without more information. All I see there is a grainy animated gif, which might have the Fox News logo on it, and something white in the background.

To comment, I would need some information about the providence of this image. That is how actual evidence is analyzed, here in reality, unlike in 9/11 Denier land, where pixelated animated gifs are concrete and conclusive evidence of the greatest conspiracy ever committed.

Instead of looking at ridiculous, possibly forged, useless gifs, why not look here: http://www.archive.org/details/911

It's a painstaking collection of over 3,000 hours of footage surrounding the events of that day, from 20 different networks over seven days.

Of course, in your delusion, every single one of these networks, in various countries, and all employees who were involved in these reports, are "part of the conspiracy," right?

Oh, and the second picture is a waterfowl.