Thread: Evidence severely lacking for claim that most of Flight 93 had buried

Originally Posted by NAB

Maybe you should put your contact list in photoshop and add a bunch of big arrows and speculative comments so he'll pay attention to it.

Maybe he should just post this evidence he claims to have and stop wasting everyone's time. Don't you agree?

Originally Posted by suede

Maybe he should just post this evidence he claims to have and stop wasting everyone's time. Don't you agree?

I agree about the wasting everyone's time part, but it's directed at you and your constant re-treading of this same bs topic truthseeker.

You get no traction for a reason.

Originally Posted by Leo2

Which Air Florida jet? If you mean Air Florida Flight 90, it hit the 14th Street Bridge, and crashed into the Potomac river. There was no parallel with United Airlines Flight 93.

If you are referring to ValuJet Flight 592 which crashed into a deep water swamp in the Florida Everglades, again, this aircraft hit water and sank, breaking up on the bedrock base. Again, no parallel.

Leo2, even though I agree with you a large plane like a 757 couldn't bury itself, I wouldn't bother trying to argue "would've/could've" with these skeptics. Simply ask them for evidence that the Shanksville plane did. Hannibal claims he has evidence to prove one did. Funny he won't post it to put a stop to all this madness.

Originally Posted by NAB

I agree about the wasting everyone's time part

So do you agree Hannibal should stop wasting everyone's time and post this alleged evidence he claims to have?

Originally Posted by suede

So do you agree Hannibal should stop wasting everyone's time and post this alleged evidence he claims to have?

I agree that you snipped the rest of my post in an attempt to be disingenuous in your response, just like everything else you post here.

I suspect that is against forum rules truthseeker.

Originally Posted by suede

Leo2, even though I agree with you a large plane like a 757 couldn't bury itself, I wouldn't bother trying to argue "would've/could've" with these skeptics. Simply ask them for evidence that the Shanksville plane did. Hannibal claims he has evidence to prove one did. Funny he won't post it to put a stop to all this madness.

What madness? You have been shown to the source. If you are to lazy or afraid to go to it, that is entirely your problem. I've done my legwork and found my evidence. When will you do yours?

Why do 'truthers' expect everything to be done for them?

Originally Posted by suede

I don't accept the official word that most of the plane was in the ground.

You seem to have missed this question:

"What official word are you referring to?"

Originally Posted by NAB

I agree that you snipped the rest of my post in an attempt to be disingenuous in your response, just like everything else you post here.

I suspect that is against forum rules truthseeker.

What was disingenuous about my response?

So do you agree Hannibal should stop wasting everyone's time and post this alleged evidence he claims to have?

Also, what was the red herring and why?

Originally Posted by suede

What was disingenuous about my response?

So do you agree Hannibal should stop wasting everyone's time and post this alleged evidence he claims to have?

Also, what was the red herring and why?

1- You clipping my post and wiggling in your ass-hattery.

2- Your entire topic

Originally Posted by Hannibal

What madness? You have been shown to the source. If you are to lazy or afraid to go to it, that is entirely your problem. I've done my legwork and found my evidence. When will you do yours?

Why do 'truthers' expect everything to be done for them?

Funny how desperate you are to not show this alleged evidence you claim to have.

Yes, I'm "lazy and afraid" to go do it. Now put up, or shut up, show this alleged evidence you claim to have, or admit you were lying that you have it. Stop waisting everyone's time.