Thread: Evidence severely lacking for claim that most of Flight 93 had buried

Originally Posted by LoneStrSt8

No it's what people who have had dealings with truthers,and their inability toaccept facts

Well try me then, show me the facts.

Originally Posted by suede

This thread is only concerned about the claim that most of Flight 93 had buried. Do any of the exhibits on that page provide significant evidence to support this claim?

What are your criteria for said 'evidence'?

Originally Posted by LoneStrSt8

What are your criteria for said 'evidence'?

Videos, photos, interviews, news reports, or anything else you think would prove the claim.

How about direct testimony, photographs and video from people who worked the crash site?

Originally Posted by suede

The evidence is that the evidence is severely lacking for that claim.

Argument by assumption: a logical fallacy.

Originally Posted by Hannibal

How about direct testimony, photographs and video from people who worked the crash site?

Do you have any of this evidence in your possession?

Originally Posted by suede

Do you have any of this evidence in your possession?

I do. You would be better served by hearing it directly from them, however.

You have been provided with their contact info. Use it. Don't be lazy or frightened.

Originally Posted by Hannibal

I do.

Sweet! Let's see it. We've only been waiting for evidence like this for 10 long years.

You would be better served by hearing it directly from them, however.

Na, from you is fine. I don't want to bother those good people.

Let's see what you got! I can't wait!! I'm really excited about this!!!

Originally Posted by suede

Sweet! Let's see it. We've only been waiting for evidence like this for 10 long years.


Na, from you is fine. I don't want to bother those good people.

Let's see what you got! I can't wait!! I'm really excited about this!!!

No, you've proven that you won't accept evidence from me. You have the means in your posession, go forth and seek the truth.

If you are sincere, that is.

Originally Posted by suede

This thread is only concerned about the claim that most of Flight 93 had buried. Do any of the exhibits on that page provide significant evidence to support this claim?

But in your original post, you made the assertion that "the very few photos of parts allegedly unearthed were staged".

Originally Posted by suede

However the evidence produced so far in the 10 long years since 9/11 to support this claim is severely lacking, so the most obvious conclusion is that the very few photos of parts allegedly unearthed were staged and nothing was really buried in the ground. The claim was just made up to offer an explanation as to why there's hardly any debris left after the Boeing 757 supposedly crashed there.

So I am just trying to clarify . . . are you asserting that
A) Flight 93 did not crash there?
or
B) Flight 93 did crash there but was not buried?