LinkBack URL
About LinkBacksWatch the part about the excavator's bucket again. And open your eyes this time.Originally Posted by LoneStrSt8
Banned
Analyst
Watch the part about the excavator's bucket again. And open your eyes this time.
Guru
Argument from assumption and incredulity. A logical fallacy.Watch the part about the excavator's bucket again. And open your eyes this time.
When will you contact the volunteers who worked at the scene of the crash?
"My hobby is conspiracy theorists: I adore them as one would a balmy uncle or a pet that can't stop walking into walls." ~ Sherlock Holmes
"The 9/11 conspiracies have not gone away because they are too ideologically and I think emotionally satisfying to the emotionally and mentally unstable people who espouse them." ~ Rachel Maddow
Banned
Analyst
That's it, throw as many big words out there as you can to try to deflect from the obvious.
The volunteers you claimed gave you evidence proving most of the plane was buried, but won't share this supposed evidence?When will you contact the volunteers who worked at the scene of the crash?
Sr. Correspondent
I had not posted when you asked that question, so the question was not for me.
My only concern for that particular incident is the alleged bouncing engine...where was it found, who found it and where is it now?
They do NOT want to rock the boat, their self interests supercede the future of this nation and even the future of their childrens children. They are a DNA remnant of what their forefathers were. Sacrifice is not in their makeup or character. __________________
Analyst
Objection,assumes facts not in evidence.Watch the part about the excavator's bucket again. And open your eyes this time.
Guru
Dictionary.com
Why get your evidence second hand when you can go right to the source? Be a grown up and take some responsibility.
"My hobby is conspiracy theorists: I adore them as one would a balmy uncle or a pet that can't stop walking into walls." ~ Sherlock Holmes
"The 9/11 conspiracies have not gone away because they are too ideologically and I think emotionally satisfying to the emotionally and mentally unstable people who espouse them." ~ Rachel Maddow
Analyst
Wrong on both counts.
They showed zero evidence of the black boxes being planted. Did you know that Honeywell and Allied Signal has been making FDRs and CVRs well before Flight 93 was put into service? Before Honeywell purchased Allied Signal? So the fact that they have two different labels means nothing. I'm sure the YouTube video creator could have unearthed that little nugget of information with a little effort, but that would remove his "gotcha" moment.
It went exactly like that.
Nope. Got any proof that the debris that they excavated were planted? Surely SOMEONE would have seen them hauling debris in.
You QUOTED the post that contains the question. Were you not replying to that post?
How nice it would be if everyone judged their party by the same high standards that they use to judge the other party.
Guru
No proof of evidence of planes being buried or bouncing engines. Why?
There isn't any.
EVERYBODY call in sick tomorrow, then watch real change begin. Hit the corporate fat cats directly in the pocketbook.
Banned
Analyst
2nd hand is fine. Let's see what you got!
Banned
Analyst
Are you talking about the very last of the many oddities the video brought up?
Only in a skeptic's mind.It went exactly like that.
No???Nope.
Amazing.
Bookmarks