Thread: Evidence STILL severely lacking for Flight 93 mostly buried claim

I really try not to have a conspiracy about this, but the story of this plane makes absolutely no sense.

Originally Posted by suede

Btw, why did you skip this part of my post?...

Because I asked you for proof first. So I'll ask again.

I'm assuming you would not say that if you didn't know it to be true. Do you have any evidence or proof that that's what happened or are you just making it up?

If you are making it up and have no proof, just say so and we'll move on.

Originally Posted by suede

Typical "skeptard" response.

It is called the truth.

Originally Posted by suede

Sounds like you're still arguing about whether the plane crashed, which again is not the topic of this thread, but evidence does exist that nothing was buried, it's called there was no evidence that most of a 757 was indeed buried!

It is your opinion no evidence exists. It was reported that most of the plane was in the ground. No evidence exists that refutes that report. Some schmuck on the internet pretending there is no evidence does not make the evidence go away.

Originally Posted by suede

Link?

Is your googler broke?

Originally Posted by suede

I saw no evidence that any of that plane buried. So how is this crash relevant except to provide evidence for my case?

The fact you cannot accept any evidence no matter how profound doesn't change the facts. Flight 1771 was mostly buried and had debris strewn around just like Flight 93.

Originally Posted by suede

No I can think of a lot, just want you to post the one's you'll except so I don't waste my time.

So let us here your best one. When we get done laughing, I'll let you know why it is such a lameassed excuse.

Originally Posted by suede

Because most of the people weren't involved with the excavation. There was only about a dozen or so people doing that and most of them were FBI agents.

And you know this how? BTW, FBI agents might have been there, but it is highly doubtful they would be extracting anything from the ground. That would be the job of the NTSB. Your lies are really pathetic.

Originally Posted by suede

It should be EASIER for you to present some of the alleged tons of debris that supposedly came out of there! lol Having a hard time with that, huh?

Not at all. No matter what you are presented, you just ignore it. What's the point?

Originally Posted by suede

You mean you lied that there were? Nice.

Nope. I didn't lie. You didn't even look. See the difference? I am not a truthtard who can't handle the truth so has to pretend ridiculous theories that make zero sense are true.

So tell us again how it makes sense to stage an accident and risk exposing the conspiracy when it would be so much easier to crash the plane. Go ahead.

Originally Posted by suede

Typical "skeptard" response.

It is called the truth.

Originally Posted by suede

Sounds like you're still arguing about whether the plane crashed, which again is not the topic of this thread, but evidence does exist that nothing was buried, it's called there was no evidence that most of a 757 was indeed buried!

It is your opinion no evidence exists. It was reported that most of the plane was in the ground. No evidence exists that refutes that report. Some schmuck on the internet pretending there is no evidence does not make the evidence go away.

Originally Posted by suede

Link?

Is your googler broke?

Originally Posted by suede

I saw no evidence that any of that plane buried. So how is this crash relevant except to provide evidence for my case?

The fact you cannot accept any evidence no matter how profound doesn't change the facts. Flight 1771 was mostly buried and had debris strewn around just like Flight 93.

Originally Posted by suede

No I can think of a lot, just want you to post the one's you'll except so I don't waste my time.

So let us here your best one. When we get done laughing, I'll let you know why it is such a lameassed excuse.

Originally Posted by suede

Because most of the people weren't involved with the excavation. There was only about a dozen or so people doing that and most of them were FBI agents.

And you know this how? BTW, FBI agents might have been there, but it is highly doubtful they would be extracting anything from the ground. That would be the job of the NTSB. Your lies are really pathetic.

Originally Posted by suede

It should be EASIER for you to present some of the alleged tons of debris that supposedly came out of there! lol Having a hard time with that, huh?

Not at all. No matter what you are presented, you just ignore it. What's the point?

Originally Posted by suede

You mean you lied that there were? Nice.

Nope. I didn't lie. You didn't even look. See the difference? I am not a truthtard who can't handle the truth so has to pretend ridiculous theories that make zero sense are true.

So tell us again how it makes sense to stage an accident and risk exposing the conspiracy when it would be so much easier to crash the plane. Go ahead.

Originally Posted by Mia

I really try not to have a conspiracy about this, but the story of this plane makes absolutely no sense.

Hooray! Another victory for sanity!

Originally Posted by DDave

Because I asked you for proof first. So I'll ask again.

Well I asked for proof about the mostly buried claim first, so...

I'm assuming you would not say that if you didn't know it to be true. Do you have any evidence or proof that that's what happened or are you just making it up?

Curious, why haven't you questioned skeptic you-know-who about any of his extraordinary claims? Biased?

what makes NO sense, is this continuing BS about whether or not the plane was buried...move on.

Originally Posted by Patriot911

It is called the truth.

No, it's called your tactic for not having to post evidence.

It is your opinion no evidence exists. It was reported that most of the plane was in the ground. No evidence exists that refutes that report.

Except that the evidence to support this report is: STILL severely lacking!

Is your googler broke?

I'm not doing the legwork to prove your claims. Only a "skeptard" thinks I should or would. lol

Flight 1771 was mostly buried... just like Flight 93.

I must have missed that being mentioned in that video. What's the timestamp when they mentioned that?

So let us here your best one. When we get done laughing, I'll let you know why it is such a lameassed excuse.

Thanks for proving my point. Btw, if the evidence is overwhelming that 93 crashed, how would a motive for staging change your mind?

And you know this how? BTW, FBI agents might have been there, but it is highly doubtful they would be extracting anything from the ground. That would be the job of the NTSB. Your lies are really pathetic.

Heard it from one of the volunteers at the 93 memorial site, who are trained on the official story, so accuse them of lying.

Not at all. No matter what you are presented, you just ignore it. What's the point?

Try me.

Nope. I didn't lie. You didn't even look.

I did, I didn't see you post any links to prove your extraordinary claims.

Originally Posted by LoneStrSt8

what makes NO sense, is this continuing BS about whether or not the plane was buried...move on.

Why is it "BS"? Is it because you know it's you skeptic's Achilles heal? That would make sense why you'd want us truthers to "move on" from it. lol

Originally Posted by suede

Why is it "BS"? Is it because you know it's you skeptic's Achilles heal? That would make sense why you'd want us truthers to "move on" from it. lol

No, because it makes no diference, the plane is gone, the people are still dead...move on to another topic...and I'm not the 'skeptic'....YOU are.